Comparison Overview
Kohler Indonesia

Kohler Indonesia
N/A
Last Update: 29/04/2026
We’re a community of creators. Status quo busters. Difference makers. For more than 150 years, we’ve built our business on a singular mission—helping people live gracious, healthy, and sustainable lives. Thanks to the passion, craftsmanship, and ingenuity of our ass...

A. O. Smith Corporation
11270 W. Park Place, Milwaukee, WI, US, 53224
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Celebrating its 150th year of business, A. O. Smith is a leading global water technology and manufacturing company that proudly employs more than 12,000 people who together provide water heating and water treatment solutions. The company is headquartered in Milwaukee,...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Kohler Indonesia







A. O. Smith Corporation






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Kohler Indonesia in 2026.
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for A. O. Smith Corporation in 2026.
Incident History - Kohler Indonesia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Kohler Indonesia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - A. O. Smith Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
A. O. Smith Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Kohler Indonesia

A. O. Smith Corporation
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.