Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KOGAKOGA
VS
DecathlonDecathlon
KOGA

KOGA

Tinweg 9, Heerenveen, 8445 PD, NL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.koga.com
760/1000Fair

KOGA is a premium brand with a sporty character. Established in 1974, KOGA has been working consistently on the basis of a corporate philosophy in which the development and construction of handmade, exclusive and technically high quality bicycles is key. Continuous inno...

NAICS:33992
NAICS Definition:Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing
Employees:172
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Decathlon

Decathlon

Villeneuve-d'Ascq, LILLE, FR, 59650

Last Update: 24/07/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.decathlon-united.media/
742/1000Moderate

We are Decathlon. We are sport. And we believe that sport brings out the best in people, especially those in teams. Our teammates are as passionate about people as they are about sport. Our values guide our daily actions: Vitality, Generosity, Responsibility, and Au...

NAICS:33992
NAICS Definition:Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing
Employees:37,105
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KOGA

KOGA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Decathlon

Decathlon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KOGA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Decathlon has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - KOGA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KOGA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Decathlon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Decathlon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KOGA

KOGA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Decathlon

Decathlon

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEC1784867017

FAQ

Between KOGA company and Decathlon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KOGA company and Decathlon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KOGA company and Decathlon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KOGA company and Decathlon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KOGA company and Decathlon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KOGA company and Decathlon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KOGA company and Decathlon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KOGA company and Decathlon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KOGA company and Decathlon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KOGA company and Decathlon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KOGA company and Decathlon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KOGA and Decathlon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KOGA and Decathlon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KOGA or Decathlon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KOGA or Decathlon ?
Between KOGA and Decathlon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KOGA and Decathlon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES