Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KoçtaşKoçtaş
VS
Costa CoffeeCosta Coffee
Koçtaş

Koçtaş

Taşdelen Mahallesi, Sırrı Çelik Bulvarı No:5 34788 Çekmeköy - İSTANBUL, İstanbul, 34788, TR

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.koctas.com.tr/
767/1000Fair

Koçtaş, yaşama değer katma serüvenine 1955 yılında Türkiye’nin en büyük sanayi ve hizmet topluluğu Koç Holding bünyesinde başladı. Yapı malzemesi toptancısı olarak attığı bu ilk adımın ardından 1996 yılında açtığı Bornova mağazası ile perakende sektörüne yöneldi. 30 yıl...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:2,427
Subsidiaries:53
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Costa Coffee

Costa Coffee

1A Wimpole St, London, W1G 0EA, GB

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.costa.co.uk
799/1000Fair

At Costa Coffee, we’ve been crafting with heart and changing the coffee game since 1971. Now part of The Coca-Cola Company, we proudly operate in over 50 countries, and we’re still growing! And we’re much more than our beloved stores. Consumers all over the world can no...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:18,458
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Koçtaş

Koçtaş

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Costa Coffee

Costa Coffee

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Koçtaş in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Costa Coffee in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Koçtaş (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Koçtaş cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Costa Coffee (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Costa Coffee cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Koçtaş

Koçtaş

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Costa Coffee

Costa Coffee

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Koçtaş company and Costa Coffee company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Koçtaş company and Costa Coffee company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Koçtaş company and Costa Coffee company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Koçtaş company and Costa Coffee company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Koçtaş company and Costa Coffee company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Koçtaş company and Costa Coffee company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Koçtaş company and Costa Coffee company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Koçtaş company and Costa Coffee company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Koçtaş company and Costa Coffee company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Koçtaş company and Costa Coffee company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Koçtaş company and Costa Coffee company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Koçtaş and Costa Coffee, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Koçtaş and Costa Coffee, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Koçtaş or Costa Coffee ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Koçtaş or Costa Coffee ?
Between Koçtaş and Costa Coffee, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Koçtaş and Costa Coffee, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1