Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Koc Finansman A.S.Koc Finansman A.S.
VS
Absa GroupAbsa Group
Koc Finansman A.S.

Koc Finansman A.S.

Ünalan Mahallesi Ayazma Cd. Koç Çamlıca İş Merkezi, A Blok no:131 İç Kapı No:4 34700 Üsküdar / İSTANBUL, istanbul, None, TR, 34700

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile
757/1000Fair

As Turkey’s first financial services company, Koçfinans offers individual and corporate financing solutions with an innovative, technology-driven approach and a network of over 1,000 contracted sales points. With its broad range of products, flexible payment options, an...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:238
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Absa Group

Absa Group

7th Floor, Absa Towers West, 15 Troye Street, Johannesburg, Johannesburg, ZA, 2001

Last Update: 30/06/2026

View Profile
714/1000Moderate

Absa Group Limited (Absa) has forged a new way of getting things done, driven by bravery and passion, with the readiness to realise growth on the African continent and beyond. We’re a truly African brand, inspired by the people we serve in Botswana, Ghana, Kenya, Maur...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:41,900
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Koc Finansman A.S.

Koc Finansman A.S.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Absa Group

Absa Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Koc Finansman A.S. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Absa Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Koc Finansman A.S. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Koc Finansman A.S. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Absa Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Absa Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Koc Finansman A.S.

Koc Finansman A.S.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Absa Group

Absa Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CITSTAABS1782779964

FAQ

Between Koc Finansman A.S. company and Absa Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Koc Finansman A.S. company and Absa Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Koc Finansman A.S. company and Absa Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Koc Finansman A.S. company and Absa Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Koc Finansman A.S. company and Absa Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Koc Finansman A.S. company and Absa Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Koc Finansman A.S. company and Absa Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Koc Finansman A.S. company and Absa Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Koc Finansman A.S. company and Absa Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Koc Finansman A.S. company and Absa Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Koc Finansman A.S. company and Absa Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Koc Finansman A.S. and Absa Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Koc Finansman A.S. and Absa Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Koc Finansman A.S. or Absa Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Koc Finansman A.S. or Absa Group ?
Between Koc Finansman A.S. and Absa Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Koc Finansman A.S. and Absa Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA