Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KGKnauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG
VS
John DeereJohn Deere
Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG

Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG

Einersheimer Str. 53, Iphofen, Bayern 97346, DE

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.pft.net
745/1000Moderate

ALWAYS AT YOUR SITE PFT steht für in mehreren Generationen gewachsenes Know-how und die tiefe Verwurzelung in der Branche. In der PFT Technik spiegeln sich Leidenschaft für das Produkt, Ideenreichtum und der unermüdliche Drang zur Weiterentwicklung wieder. Die Produkte...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:98
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
John Deere

John Deere

Moline, 61265, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.deere.com/AboutUs
821/1000Good

It doesn’t matter if you’ve never driven a tractor, mowed a lawn, or operated a dozer. With John Deere’s role in helping produce food, fiber, fuel, and infrastructure, we work for every single person on the planet. It all started nearly 200 years ago with a steel plow...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:53,435
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG

Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
John Deere

John Deere

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for John Deere in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - John Deere (X = Date, Y = Severity)

John Deere cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG

Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
John Deere

John Deere

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and John Deere company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and John Deere company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and John Deere company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and John Deere company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and John Deere company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and John Deere company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and John Deere company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and John Deere company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and John Deere company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and John Deere company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and John Deere company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG and John Deere, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG and John Deere, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG or John Deere ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG or John Deere ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG and John Deere, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG and John Deere, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9