Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KGKnauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG
VS
Atlas CopcoAtlas Copco
Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG

Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG

Einersheimer Str. 53, Iphofen, Bayern 97346, DE

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.pft.net
745/1000Moderate

ALWAYS AT YOUR SITE PFT steht für in mehreren Generationen gewachsenes Know-how und die tiefe Verwurzelung in der Branche. In der PFT Technik spiegeln sich Leidenschaft für das Produkt, Ideenreichtum und der unermüdliche Drang zur Weiterentwicklung wieder. Die Produkte...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:98
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Atlas Copco

Atlas Copco

Sickla Industriväg 19, Stockholm, SE, 131 54

Last Update: 24/09/2026

View Profile

Atlas Copco delivers innovative products and solutions that help businesses grow and drive progress. Our portfolio spans compressed air and gas systems and treatment, vacuum solutions, industrial power tools, assembly systems, and power and flow solutions. We bring a ...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:35,258
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG

Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Atlas Copco

Atlas Copco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlas Copco in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Atlas Copco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlas Copco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG

Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Atlas Copco

Atlas Copco

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and Atlas Copco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and Atlas Copco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and Atlas Copco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and Atlas Copco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG company and Atlas Copco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG and Atlas Copco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG and Atlas Copco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG or Atlas Copco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG or Atlas Copco ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG and Atlas Copco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Knauf PFT GmbH & Co. KG and Atlas Copco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3