Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Knauf SrbijaKnauf Srbija
VS
COLASCOLAS
Knauf Srbija

Knauf Srbija

Batajnički drum 16 b, Belgrade, RS

Last Update: 21/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.knauf.rs
750/1000Fair

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:8
Subsidiaries:98
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
COLAS

COLAS

1, Rue du Colonel Pierre Avia, Paris, 75015, FR

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://allinks.click/colas
841/1000Good

Colas, a subsidiary of the Bouygues Group, is a major player in the construction and maintenance of transportation infrastructure and urban development. Colas covers the entire value chain: from industrial production to service offerings, including construction work. ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:13,523
Subsidiaries:119
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Knauf Srbija

Knauf Srbija

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
COLAS

COLAS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Knauf Srbija in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COLAS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Knauf Srbija (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Knauf Srbija cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - COLAS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COLAS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Knauf Srbija

Knauf Srbija

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
COLAS

COLAS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Knauf Srbija company and COLAS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Knauf Srbija company and COLAS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Knauf Srbija company and COLAS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Knauf Srbija company and COLAS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Knauf Srbija company and COLAS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Knauf Srbija company and COLAS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Knauf Srbija company and COLAS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Knauf Srbija company and COLAS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Knauf Srbija company and COLAS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Knauf Srbija company and COLAS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Knauf Srbija company and COLAS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Knauf Srbija and COLAS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Knauf Srbija and COLAS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Knauf Srbija or COLAS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Knauf Srbija or COLAS ?
Between Knauf Srbija and COLAS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Knauf Srbija and COLAS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES