Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Knauf Isopor®Knauf Isopor®
VS
Tetra PakTetra Pak
Knauf Isopor®

Knauf Isopor®

Av. Fagundes Filho, 141/145 - Conjunto 16/19, Edifício Denver | Vila Monte Alegre, São Paulo, 04304-010 , BR

Last Update: 23/12/2025

View Profile
744/1000Moderate

A Knauf Isopor® oferece soluções em embalagens, peças técnicas e projetos personalizados em EPS Isopor® e também em EPP (polipropileno expandido) para seu negócio. Está presente no Amazonas, Bahia, Minas Gerais, Pará, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina e São Paulo. A Kn...

NAICS:326112
NAICS Definition:Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
Employees:288
Subsidiaries:100
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tetra Pak

Tetra Pak

70 Avenue Général-Guisan, CH-1009 PULLY/LAUSANNE, Case Postale 446, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tetrapak.com
789/1000Fair

We’re here to make food safe and available. It’s why we provide advanced food production systems, from product creation and recipe testing to processing, filling, packaging, logistics, services and beyond. We support almost every food and beverage category with tailored...

NAICS:326112
NAICS Definition:Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
Employees:25,859
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Knauf Isopor®

Knauf Isopor®

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tetra Pak

Tetra Pak

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Knauf Isopor® in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tetra Pak in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Knauf Isopor® (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Knauf Isopor® cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tetra Pak (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tetra Pak cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Knauf Isopor®

Knauf Isopor®

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tetra Pak

Tetra Pak

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Knauf Isopor® company and Tetra Pak company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Knauf Isopor® company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Knauf Isopor® company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Knauf Isopor® company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Knauf Isopor® company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Knauf Isopor® company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Knauf Isopor® company and Tetra Pak company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Knauf Isopor® company and Tetra Pak company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Knauf Isopor® company and Tetra Pak company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Knauf Isopor® company and Tetra Pak company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Knauf Isopor® company and Tetra Pak company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Knauf Isopor® and Tetra Pak, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Knauf Isopor® and Tetra Pak, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Knauf Isopor® or Tetra Pak ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Knauf Isopor® or Tetra Pak ?
Between Knauf Isopor® and Tetra Pak, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Knauf Isopor® and Tetra Pak, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66591
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in David Lingren Media LIbrary Assistant allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Media LIbrary Assistant: from n/a through 3.39.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-66589
SUMMARY

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Kings Plugins B2BKing allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects B2BKing: from n/a through 5.2.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-27365
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in PublishPress PublishPress Series allows Stored XSS. This issue affects PublishPress Series: from n/a through 2.17.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-73974
SUMMARY

linuxfabrik-lib provides Python modules for database access, caching, shell execution, and API integrations, and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins uses its shared testing helper across check plugins. Prior to linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0, lib.lftest.test() treated the first or second element of a --test CSV argument as a filesystem path and returned the file contents as simulated standard output or standard error without path confinement. The hidden but production-accessible --test argument was accepted by sudo-authorized plugins, so an attacker controlling the nagios or icinga account could use check-plugins/deb-updates/deb-updates with its default QUERY=1 to disclose every line of a root-readable file. Approximately 22 other plugins exposed filtered content or a root file existence and readability oracle through the same helper, while check-plugins/network-bonding/network-bonding and check-plugins/openstack-swift-stat/openstack-swift-stat had direct read paths that bypassed the helper. The library fix confines fixture reads to the invoking plugin's unit-test directory and refuses unsafe anchors, and the plugin fix routes the two bypasses through that helper. These issues are fixed in linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-73973
SUMMARY

Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins provides monitoring plugins for Icinga, Nagios, and related systems. Prior to version 7.0.0, check-plugins/logfile/logfile accepted a free-form --filename path and opened it as root when invoked through the shipped nagios or icinga sudoers allowlist, without confining the resolved path to /var/log. An attacker who controls the monitoring account can select a root-readable file such as /etc/shadow and use --warning-regex . while leaving SUPPRESS_OUTPUT false, causing each nonempty line to be collected in warn_matches and returned through lib.base.oao(). The vulnerable flow passes the expanded scan_path directly to open(), and neither real-path containment nor an allowlist protects the sink. The same fix also confines mysql-logfile and openvpn-client-list paths, allows only documented log roots, and resolves symlinks and parent-directory traversal before checking containment. This issue is fixed in version 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8