Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Knauf Insulation HrvatskaKnauf Insulation Hrvatska
VS
STRABAGSTRABAG
Knauf Insulation Hrvatska

Knauf Insulation Hrvatska

Varaždinska 140, Novi Marof, Hrvatska 42220, HR

Last Update: 24/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Knauf Insulation je jedno od najbrže rastućih i najcjenjenijih imena u izolacijama širom svijeta s više od 40 godina iskustva. Svakodnevno se trudimo kako bi korisnicima naših proizvoda omogućili da zadovolje sve veću potrebu za energetskom učinkovitošću i održivosti u ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:98
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
STRABAG

STRABAG

Ortenburger Strasse 27, Spittal/Drau, 9800, AT

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://karriere.strabag.com
783/1000Fair

At STRABAG around 86,000 people working on progress at more than 2,400 locations worldwide. Uniqueness and individual strengths characterise both our projects and each of us as individuals. Whether its building construction, civil engineering, road construction, undergr...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:21,228
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Knauf Insulation Hrvatska

Knauf Insulation Hrvatska

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
STRABAG

STRABAG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Knauf Insulation Hrvatska in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for STRABAG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Knauf Insulation Hrvatska (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Knauf Insulation Hrvatska cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - STRABAG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STRABAG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Knauf Insulation Hrvatska

Knauf Insulation Hrvatska

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
STRABAG

STRABAG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Knauf Insulation Hrvatska company and STRABAG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Knauf Insulation Hrvatska company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Knauf Insulation Hrvatska company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Knauf Insulation Hrvatska company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Knauf Insulation Hrvatska company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Knauf Insulation Hrvatska company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Knauf Insulation Hrvatska company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Knauf Insulation Hrvatska company and STRABAG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Knauf Insulation Hrvatska company and STRABAG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Knauf Insulation Hrvatska company and STRABAG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Knauf Insulation Hrvatska company and STRABAG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Knauf Insulation Hrvatska and STRABAG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Knauf Insulation Hrvatska and STRABAG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Knauf Insulation Hrvatska or STRABAG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Knauf Insulation Hrvatska or STRABAG ?
Between Knauf Insulation Hrvatska and STRABAG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Knauf Insulation Hrvatska and STRABAG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9