Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Knauf Insulation GmbHKnauf Insulation GmbH
VS
Travis Perkins plcTravis Perkins plc
Knauf Insulation GmbH

Knauf Insulation GmbH

Heraklithstraße 8, Simbach am Inn, 84359, DE

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
746/1000Moderate

Knauf Insulation verfügt über eine einzigartig breite Produktpalette. Dämmlösungen aus Glas- und Steinwolle sowie Holzwolle-Produkte für den Hoch- und Industriebau und für industrielle Anwendungen bilden das Portfolio. Knauf Insulation ist der Dämmstoffspezialist der Kn...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:69
Subsidiaries:101
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Travis Perkins plc

Travis Perkins plc

Ryehill House, Rye Hill Close, Northampton, NN5 7UA, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Travis Perkins plc is the UK’s largest distributor of building materials to trade customers. The breadth, reach and scale of our business means we are in a unique position to provide customers with the building materials and tools they need for their projects, when and ...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:12,742
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Knauf Insulation GmbH

Knauf Insulation GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Travis Perkins plc

Travis Perkins plc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Knauf Insulation GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Travis Perkins plc in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Knauf Insulation GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Knauf Insulation GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Travis Perkins plc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Travis Perkins plc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Knauf Insulation GmbH

Knauf Insulation GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Travis Perkins plc

Travis Perkins plc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Knauf Insulation GmbH company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Knauf Insulation GmbH company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Knauf Insulation GmbH company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Knauf Insulation GmbH company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Knauf Insulation GmbH company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Knauf Insulation GmbH company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Knauf Insulation GmbH company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Knauf Insulation GmbH company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Knauf Insulation GmbH company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Knauf Insulation GmbH company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Knauf Insulation GmbH company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Knauf Insulation GmbH and Travis Perkins plc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Knauf Insulation GmbH and Travis Perkins plc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Knauf Insulation GmbH or Travis Perkins plc ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Knauf Insulation GmbH or Travis Perkins plc ?
Between Knauf Insulation GmbH and Travis Perkins plc, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Knauf Insulation GmbH and Travis Perkins plc, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA