Comparison Overview
Knauf Cyprus

Knauf Cyprus
1, Christou Zeipekki Str. , Limassol, Vasa 4504, CY
Last Update: 19/12/2025
Knauf Cyprus Ltd is a member of the German KNAUF Group. Today Knauf is one of the world's leading manufacturers of modern insulation materials, drylining systems, plasters and accessories, thermal insulation composite systems, paints, floor screed, floor systems, and co...

Travis Perkins plc
Ryehill House, Rye Hill Close, Northampton, NN5 7UA, GB
Last Update: 19/09/2026
Travis Perkins plc is the UK’s largest distributor of building materials to trade customers. The breadth, reach and scale of our business means we are in a unique position to provide customers with the building materials and tools they need for their projects, when and ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Knauf Cyprus







Travis Perkins plc






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Knauf Cyprus in 2026.
Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Travis Perkins plc in 2026.
Incident History - Knauf Cyprus (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Knauf Cyprus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Travis Perkins plc (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Travis Perkins plc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Knauf Cyprus

Travis Perkins plc
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.
The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.
The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.
With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.
The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.