Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KLN Logistics GroupKLN Logistics Group
VS
Penske LogisticsPenske Logistics
KLN Logistics Group

KLN Logistics Group

16/F Kerry Cargo Centre, 55 Wing Kei Road, Kwai Chung, Hong Kong, CN

Last Update: 21/07/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.kln.com
680/1000Weak

KLN is an Asia-based, global 3PL with a highly diversified business portfolio and extensive coverage in Asia. We offer a broad range of supply chain solutions from integrated logistics, international freight forwarding (air, ocean, road, rail and multimodal) and e-comme...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:3,585
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Penske Logistics

Penske Logistics

2675 Morgantown Rd, Reading, 19607, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

Penske Logistics is a Penske Transportation Solutions company headquartered in Reading, Pennsylvania. The company is a leading provider of innovative supply chain and logistics solutions. Penske offers solutions including dedicated transportation, distribution center ma...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:11,454
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KLN Logistics Group

KLN Logistics Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Penske Logistics

Penske Logistics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

KLN Logistics Group has 33.33% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Penske Logistics in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KLN Logistics Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KLN Logistics Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Penske Logistics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Penske Logistics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KLN Logistics Group

KLN Logistics Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
KLNAPE1784651517
Penske Logistics

Penske Logistics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KLN Logistics Group company and Penske Logistics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KLN Logistics Group company and Penske Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KLN Logistics Group company and Penske Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KLN Logistics Group company and Penske Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KLN Logistics Group company and Penske Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KLN Logistics Group company and Penske Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KLN Logistics Group company and Penske Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KLN Logistics Group company and Penske Logistics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KLN Logistics Group company and Penske Logistics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KLN Logistics Group company and Penske Logistics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KLN Logistics Group company and Penske Logistics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KLN Logistics Group and Penske Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KLN Logistics Group and Penske Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KLN Logistics Group or Penske Logistics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KLN Logistics Group or Penske Logistics ?
Between KLN Logistics Group and Penske Logistics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KLN Logistics Group and Penske Logistics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA