Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASILSAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL
VS
Bridgestone AmericasBridgestone Americas
SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL

SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL

Av. Pres. Getúlio Vargas, 9994 - Maria Regina, Alvorada - RS, Brasil, ALVORADA, Rio Grande do Sul 94836-000, BR

Last Update: 01/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.kll.com.br/
749/1000Moderate

Desde 1988 produzindo suspensões e componentes para veículos comerciais, a KLL destaca-se pela elevada qualidade e desempenho de seus produtos. O desenvolvimento de suspensões de alta tecnologia, visando atender segmentos específicos do transporte rodoviário de cargas e...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bridgestone Americas

Bridgestone Americas

200 4th Ave S, Nashville, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
737/1000Moderate

Bridgestone Americas, Inc. (BSAM), headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee, and Bridgestone Europe, Middle East and Africa (BSEMEA), headquartered in Brussels, Belgium, operate collectively as a “Bridgestone West” strategic region. This region services the strategic busin...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:19,085
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL

SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bridgestone Americas

Bridgestone Americas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bridgestone Americas in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bridgestone Americas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bridgestone Americas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL

SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bridgestone Americas

Bridgestone Americas

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BRI1437922
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BRI1454214092325
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BRI23292322

FAQ

Between SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL company and Bridgestone Americas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL and Bridgestone Americas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL and Bridgestone Americas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL or Bridgestone Americas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL or Bridgestone Americas ?
Between SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL and Bridgestone Americas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SAF-HOLLAND DO BRASIL and Bridgestone Americas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA