Comparison Overview

Klabin

VS

APP Group

Klabin

Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, São Paulo, 04538-132, BR
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849

Somos a maior produtora e exportadora de papéis para embalagens do Brasil, líderes nos mercados de embalagens de papelão ondulado, sacos industriais e papel-cartão e a única indústria do País a oferecer soluções em celuloses de fibra curta, fibra longa e fluff. Com mais de 120 anos de história, temos 22 unidades industriais no Brasil e uma na Argentina e uma capacidade produtiva anual de 4,5 milhões de toneladas de celulose de mercado e papéis. Toda a gestão da Klabin está orientada para o desenvolvimento sustentável e buscamos crescimento integrado e responsável, que une rentabilidade, desenvolvimento social e compromisso ambiental. Desde 2014 integramos o Índice de Sustentabilidade Empresarial (ISE) da B3 e, desde 2020, o Índice Dow Jones Best-in-Class, com participação na carteira Global e de Mercados Emergentes. Saiba mais sobre a nossa atuação em klabin.com.br. ⚠️ Atenção! A Klabin e seus parceiros de recrutamento não cobram qualquer valor dos candidatos em seus processos seletivos.

NAICS: 322
NAICS Definition: Paper Manufacturing
Employees: 15,635
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

APP Group

Sinar Mas Land Plaza, Tower II, 5th Floor. M.H Thamrin Street No.51, Jakarta, Central Jakarta, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, ID, 10350
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

APP serves as the holding company for multiple Indonesia pulp and paper manufacturing as well as forestry entities, catering to the increasing global need for high-quality tissue, packaging, and paper. Our products reach over 150 countries spanning six continents. APP Group serves as group name of pulp, paper and forestry entities under APP and its affiliates including the pulp and paper and forestry operation in China. Driven by a dedication to sustainability and ethical practices, we prioritize the well-being of our employees, society, and environment. Our approach involves harnessing technological advancements and fostering innovation, collaborating closely with communities, and upholding internationally recognized business and operational standards throughout our production and supply chain. Aligned with the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles, our Sustainability Roadmap Vision 2030 steers our actions toward safeguarding environment, bolstering local communities, preserving biodiversity, and striving for carbon neutrality in all our endeavors.

NAICS: 322
NAICS Definition: Paper Manufacturing
Employees: 18,999
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/klabin.jpeg
Klabin
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/appgroupid.jpeg
APP Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Klabin
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
APP Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Paper and Forest Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Klabin in 2026.

Incidents vs Paper and Forest Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for APP Group in 2026.

Incident History — Klabin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Klabin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — APP Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

APP Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/klabin.jpeg
Klabin
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/appgroupid.jpeg
APP Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Klabin company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to APP Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, APP Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Klabin company.

In the current year, APP Group company and Klabin company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither APP Group company nor Klabin company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither APP Group company nor Klabin company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither APP Group company nor Klabin company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Klabin company nor APP Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Klabin nor APP Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Klabin company nor APP Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

APP Group company employs more people globally than Klabin company, reflecting its scale as a Paper and Forest Product Manufacturing.

Neither Klabin nor APP Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Klabin nor APP Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Klabin nor APP Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Klabin nor APP Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Klabin nor APP Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Klabin nor APP Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N