Comparison Overview
Kiteworks

Kiteworks
1510 Fashion Island Blvd, San Mateo, 94404, US
Last Update: 09/07/2026
Kiteworks' mission is to empower organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive data. To this end, we created a platform that delivers data governance, compliance, and protection to customers. The platform unifies, tracks, ...

PedidosYa
La Cumparsita 1475, 11200 Montevideo, Departamento de Montevideo, Montevideo, Montevideo, UY, 11200
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We’re the delivery market leader in Latin America. Our platform connects over 77.000 restaurants, supermarkets, pharmacies and stores with millions of users. Nowadays we operate in more than 500 cities in Latinamerica. And we are now over 3.400 employees. PedidosYa is ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Kiteworks







PedidosYa






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Kiteworks has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for PedidosYa in 2026.
Incident History - Kiteworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Kiteworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PedidosYa (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PedidosYa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Kiteworks

PedidosYa
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.