Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kitchen, Aarhus UniversitetKitchen, Aarhus Universitet
VS
The University of Texas at AustinThe University of Texas at Austin
Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet

Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet

Universitetsbyen 76, Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, DK, 8000

Last Update: 18/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://kitchen.au.dk/
773/1000Fair

Kitchen styrker innovation, iværksætteri og samarbejde på tværs af Aarhus Universitet. Vi tilbyder rammer, hvor idéer og viden kan udvikles til løsninger på fremtidens problemer. Kitchen er et mødested for innovation, iværksætteri og samarbejde på Aarhus Universitet. ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The University of Texas at Austin

The University of Texas at Austin

1 University Station, Austin, TX, US, 78712

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.utexas.edu/
815/1000Good

The University of Texas at Austin is one of the largest public universities in the United States. Founded in 1883, the University has grown from a single building, eight teachers, two departments and 221 students to a 350-acre main campus with 21,000 faculty and staff, ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:26,129
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet

Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The University of Texas at Austin

The University of Texas at Austin

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Texas at Austin in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The University of Texas at Austin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Texas at Austin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet

Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The University of Texas at Austin

The University of Texas at Austin

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet company and The University of Texas at Austin company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet company and The University of Texas at Austin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet company and The University of Texas at Austin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet company and The University of Texas at Austin company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet company and The University of Texas at Austin company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet company and The University of Texas at Austin company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet company and The University of Texas at Austin company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet company and The University of Texas at Austin company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet company and The University of Texas at Austin company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet company and The University of Texas at Austin company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet company and The University of Texas at Austin company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet and The University of Texas at Austin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet and The University of Texas at Austin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet or The University of Texas at Austin ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet or The University of Texas at Austin ?
Between Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet and The University of Texas at Austin, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kitchen, Aarhus Universitet and The University of Texas at Austin, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2