Comparison Overview
King's Arts & Humanities

King's Arts & Humanities
22 Kingsway, London, England, WC2B 6LE, GB
Last Update: 19/04/2026
Bringing to bear our world-leading expertise of arts and humanities disciplines on some of the world's most pressing challenges. | Official King's College London, Faculty of Arts & Humanities LinkedIn account | #KingsArtsHums

Virginia Tech
800 Drillfield Drive, Blacksburg, 24061, US
Last Update: 08/05/2026
Dedicated to its motto, Ut Prosim (That I May Serve), Virginia Tech takes a hands-on, engaging approach to education, preparing scholars to be leaders in their fields and communities. As the commonwealth’s most comprehensive university and its leading research instituti...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

King's Arts & Humanities







Virginia Tech






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for King's Arts & Humanities in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Virginia Tech has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - King's Arts & Humanities (X = Date, Y = Severity)
King's Arts & Humanities cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Virginia Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Virginia Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

King's Arts & Humanities

Virginia Tech
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.