Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

King Arthur Baking CompanyKing Arthur Baking Company
VS
The Coca-Cola CompanyThe Coca-Cola Company
King Arthur Baking Company

King Arthur Baking Company

135 US Route 5 S, None, Norwich, Vermont, US, 05055

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
717/1000Moderate

The single word that defines the work experience at King Arthur Baking Company: PRIDE. Pride in being a 100% employee-owned business, pride in being a B Corporation and a member of the 1% for the Planet, pride in providing superior baking products to passionate customer...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:327
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
The Coca-Cola Company

The Coca-Cola Company

One Coca-Cola Plaza, Atlanta, 30313, US

Last Update: 16/07/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

From our roots at the counter of a local Atlanta pharmacy, to our current portfolio of more than 200 beverages, The Coca-Cola Company is one of the most globally-recognized brands in the world. Today, our lineup features beloved beverage brands, including ​ Coca-Cola, S...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:53,568
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
King Arthur Baking Company

King Arthur Baking Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The Coca-Cola Company

The Coca-Cola Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for King Arthur Baking Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

The Coca-Cola Company has 90.48% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - King Arthur Baking Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

King Arthur Baking Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The Coca-Cola Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Coca-Cola Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
King Arthur Baking Company

King Arthur Baking Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KIN233072725
The Coca-Cola Company

The Coca-Cola Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FAITHE1784240634
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PEPDELADOFIFTHEADINETOPE1783376814
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE182330422

FAQ

Between King Arthur Baking Company company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between King Arthur Baking Company company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between King Arthur Baking Company company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between King Arthur Baking Company company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between King Arthur Baking Company company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between King Arthur Baking Company company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between King Arthur Baking Company company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between King Arthur Baking Company company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between King Arthur Baking Company company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between King Arthur Baking Company company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between King Arthur Baking Company company and The Coca-Cola Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between King Arthur Baking Company and The Coca-Cola Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between King Arthur Baking Company and The Coca-Cola Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - King Arthur Baking Company or The Coca-Cola Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - King Arthur Baking Company or The Coca-Cola Company ?
Between King Arthur Baking Company and The Coca-Cola Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between King Arthur Baking Company and The Coca-Cola Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2