Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

King's InterHighKing's InterHigh
VS
Toronto District School BoardToronto District School Board
King's InterHigh

King's InterHigh

Worldwide, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
771/1000Fair

King’s InterHigh is an online independent British international school. Offering Primary, Secondary and Sixth Form education, the school caters to students from age 7 – 18 who are looking for a high quality international and British education delivered in a way that rev...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:166
Subsidiaries:57
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Toronto District School Board

Toronto District School Board

5050 Yonge Street, Toronto, M2N 5N8, CA

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tdsb.on.ca
713/1000Moderate

The Toronto District School Board (TDSB) is the largest and one of the most diverse school boards in Canada, and recognized by Forbes and Statista as one of Canada's Best Employers for Diversity for 2023. We serve more than 239,000 students in 582 schools throughout Tor...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:11,546
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
King's InterHigh

King's InterHigh

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Toronto District School Board

Toronto District School Board

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for King's InterHigh in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Toronto District School Board in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - King's InterHigh (X = Date, Y = Severity)

King's InterHigh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Toronto District School Board (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toronto District School Board cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
King's InterHigh

King's InterHigh

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Toronto District School Board

Toronto District School Board

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
POW1393613112025

FAQ

Between King's InterHigh company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between King's InterHigh company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between King's InterHigh company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between King's InterHigh company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between King's InterHigh company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between King's InterHigh company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between King's InterHigh company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between King's InterHigh company and Toronto District School Board company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between King's InterHigh company and Toronto District School Board company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between King's InterHigh company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between King's InterHigh company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between King's InterHigh and Toronto District School Board, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between King's InterHigh and Toronto District School Board, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - King's InterHigh or Toronto District School Board ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - King's InterHigh or Toronto District School Board ?
Between King's InterHigh and Toronto District School Board, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between King's InterHigh and Toronto District School Board, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-12484
SUMMARY

A vulnerability in keras-team/keras version 3.15.0 allows unsafe deserialization of attacker-controlled PyTorch pickle data through the public `keras.layers.TorchModuleWrapper.from_config` method. This method invokes `torch.load(..., weights_only=False)` without requiring an explicit unsafe opt-in, such as a `safe_mode=False` parameter. When called outside a `SafeModeScope(True)` context, the absence of an ambient safe mode state permits unsafe deserialization by default. This issue can lead to arbitrary code execution if untrusted Keras layer configurations are processed using this method. The vulnerability arises because the method does not enforce safe deserialization practices unless explicitly guarded by Keras safe mode.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-19
UPDATED
Date2026-07-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-64186
SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommu/amd: Remove latent out-of-bounds access in IOMMU debugfs In iommu_mmio_write() and iommu_capability_write(), the variables dbg_mmio_offset and dbg_cap_offset are declared as int. However, they are populated using kstrtou32_from_user(). If a user provides a sufficiently large value, it can become a negative integer. Prior to this patch, the AMD IOMMU debugfs implementation was already protected by different mechanisms. 1. #define OFS_IN_SZ 8 ensures the user string <= 8 bytes, so e.g. 0xffffffff isn't a valid input. if (cnt > OFS_IN_SZ) return -EINVAL; 2. Implicit type promotion in iommu_mmio_write(), dbg_mmio_offset is int and iommu->mmio_phys_end is u64 if (dbg_mmio_offset > iommu->mmio_phys_end - sizeof(u64)) return -EINVAL; 3. The show handlers would currently catch the negative number and refuse to perform the read. Replace kstrtou32_from_user() with kstrtos32_from_user() to parse the input, and check for negative values to explicitly prevent out-of-bounds memory accesses directly in iommu_mmio_write() and iommu_capability_write().

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-19
UPDATED
Date2026-07-19
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-64185
SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sysfs: don't remove existing directory on update failure When sysfs_update_group() is called for a named group and create_files() fails (e.g. -ENOMEM), internal_create_group() calls kernfs_remove(kn) on the group directory. In the update path, kn was obtained via kernfs_find_and_get() and refers to a directory that already existed before this call. Removing it silently destroys a sysfs group that the caller did not create. Only remove the directory if we created it ourselves. On update failure the directory remains as it is left empty by remove_files() inside create_files(), but can be repopulated by a retry.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-19
UPDATED
Date2026-07-19
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-64184
SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: call missing mem_cgroup_iter_break() damon_sysfs_memcg_path_to_id() breaks mem_cgroup_iter() loop without calling mem_cgroup_iter_break(). This leaks the cgroup reference. Fix the issue by calling mem_cgroup_iter_break() before the break. The issue was discovered [1] by Sashiko.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-19
UPDATED
Date2026-07-19
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-64183
SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: efi: Allocate runtime workqueue before ACPI init Since commit 5894cf571e14 ("acpi/prmt: Use EFI runtime sandbox to invoke PRM handlers") ACPI PRM calls are delegated to a workqueue which runs in a kernel thread, making it easier to detect and mitigate faulting memory accesses performed by the firmware. Rafael reports that such PRM accesses may occur before efisubsys_init() executes, which is where the workqueue is allocated, leading to NULL pointer dereferences. Since acpi_init() [which triggers the early PRM accesses] executes as a subsys_initcall() as well, and has its own dependencies that may be sensitive to initcall ordering, deferring acpi_init() is not an option. So instead, split off the workqueue allocation into its own postcore initcall, as this is the only missing piece to allow EFI runtime calls to be made. This ensures that EFI runtime call (including PRM calls) are accessible to all code running at subsys_initcall() level.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-19
UPDATED
Date2026-07-19
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA