Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kimi (Moonshot AI)Kimi (Moonshot AI)
VS
TietoTieto
Kimi (Moonshot AI)

Kimi (Moonshot AI)

N/A

Last Update: 24/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.kimi.com/
682/1000Weak

Discover the power of Kimi K2/K2.5. Available now on kimi.com, Kimi app, Kimi API, and Kimi Code. 🚀

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:164
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Tieto

Tieto

N/A

Last Update: 19/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.tieto.com/
743/1000Moderate

Tieto provides customers across different industries with mission-critical solutions through its specialized software businesses Tieto Caretech, Tieto Banktech and Tieto Indtech as well as Tieto Tech Consulting business. The company's around 13 000 talented vertical sof...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:12,209
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kimi (Moonshot AI)

Kimi (Moonshot AI)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tieto

Tieto

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

Kimi (Moonshot AI) has 23.46% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tieto in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kimi (Moonshot AI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kimi (Moonshot AI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tieto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tieto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kimi (Moonshot AI)

Kimi (Moonshot AI)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEEKIM1790217824
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ANT1784708683
Tieto

Tieto

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TIE722080425

FAQ

Between Kimi (Moonshot AI) company and Tieto company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kimi (Moonshot AI) company and Tieto company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kimi (Moonshot AI) company and Tieto company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kimi (Moonshot AI) company and Tieto company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kimi (Moonshot AI) company and Tieto company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kimi (Moonshot AI) company and Tieto company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kimi (Moonshot AI) company and Tieto company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kimi (Moonshot AI) company and Tieto company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kimi (Moonshot AI) company and Tieto company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kimi (Moonshot AI) company and Tieto company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kimi (Moonshot AI) company and Tieto company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kimi (Moonshot AI) and Tieto, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kimi (Moonshot AI) and Tieto, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kimi (Moonshot AI) or Tieto ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kimi (Moonshot AI) or Tieto ?
Between Kimi (Moonshot AI) and Tieto, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kimi (Moonshot AI) and Tieto, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103342
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103065
SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105122
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105121
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
REFERENCES