Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KIG BVKIG BV
VS
Grupo SalinasGrupo Salinas
KIG BV

KIG BV

Claude Debussylaan 46, Amsterdam, 1082 MD, NL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://kigbv.nl/EN/
756/1000Fair

Kapital Investment Group B.V. (KIG BV) is a Dutch private company with limited liability, incorporated on August 23, 2019. Owned by GKG Holding BV in Netherlands, KIG BV operates across the globe in different business segments with highly qualified professionals throug...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo Salinas

Grupo Salinas

MX

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gruposalinas.com
793/1000Fair

Grupo Salinas es un conjunto de empresas dinámicas, que se caracterizan por la evolución constante y la innovación, enfocadas en la creación de valor económico, social y ambiental. Estamos en industrias diversas como comercio especializado, servicios financieros, tele...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:25,796
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KIG BV

KIG BV

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Salinas

Grupo Salinas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KIG BV in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Salinas in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KIG BV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KIG BV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Salinas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Salinas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KIG BV

KIG BV

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo Salinas

Grupo Salinas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KIG BV company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KIG BV company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KIG BV company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KIG BV company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KIG BV company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KIG BV company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KIG BV company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KIG BV company and Grupo Salinas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KIG BV company and Grupo Salinas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KIG BV company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KIG BV company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KIG BV and Grupo Salinas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KIG BV and Grupo Salinas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KIG BV or Grupo Salinas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KIG BV or Grupo Salinas ?
Between KIG BV and Grupo Salinas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KIG BV and Grupo Salinas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57990
SUMMARY

Files or directories accessible to external parties in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57989
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57978
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-17497
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user's machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-17496
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 renders AI chat responses with markdown-it configured with html:true and injects the result into the DOM via dangerouslySetInnerHTML in chat-preview, without HTML sanitization and with CSP set to null. Attacker-controlled content that reaches the model prompt (for example a malicious skill REFERENCE.md that instructs the model to emit HTML) can cause the model response to include executable markup such as an img onerror handler. When the user views the chat response, that markup runs as JavaScript in the privileged Tauri webview, enabling arbitrary script execution in the application context (cross-site scripting).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8