Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kids 21 Pte LtdKids 21 Pte Ltd
VS
Bata GroupBata Group
Kids 21 Pte Ltd

Kids 21 Pte Ltd

6B Orange Grove Road, Singapore, 258332, SG

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.kids21.com
810/1000Good

Part of the Kids 21 Group, Kids21 Retail is one of the region's leading curators of designer children’s fashion and lifestyle offerings. Established in 1997 and headquartered in Singapore, its fashion arm represents more than 90 brands across Singapore, Hong Kong and ...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:9
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bata Group

Bata Group

Avenue d'ouchy 61, Lausanne, 1006, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bata.com
788/1000Fair

The Bata Group is one of the world's leading manufacturers and retailers of quality footwear. A global concern with more than 32,000 employees, 21 production facilities, over 5,300 stores in more than 70 countries across the globe, Bata has been providing the best shoes...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:15,055
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kids 21 Pte Ltd

Kids 21 Pte Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bata Group

Bata Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kids 21 Pte Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bata Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kids 21 Pte Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kids 21 Pte Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bata Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bata Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kids 21 Pte Ltd

Kids 21 Pte Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bata Group

Bata Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Kids 21 Pte Ltd company and Bata Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kids 21 Pte Ltd company and Bata Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kids 21 Pte Ltd company and Bata Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kids 21 Pte Ltd company and Bata Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kids 21 Pte Ltd company and Bata Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kids 21 Pte Ltd company and Bata Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kids 21 Pte Ltd company and Bata Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kids 21 Pte Ltd company and Bata Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kids 21 Pte Ltd company and Bata Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kids 21 Pte Ltd company and Bata Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kids 21 Pte Ltd company and Bata Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kids 21 Pte Ltd and Bata Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kids 21 Pte Ltd and Bata Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kids 21 Pte Ltd or Bata Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kids 21 Pte Ltd or Bata Group ?
Between Kids 21 Pte Ltd and Bata Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kids 21 Pte Ltd and Bata Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA