Comparison Overview
Kido

Kido
113 Blegborough Road, London, SW16 6DL, GB
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We are redefining early childhood education in more ways than one. We have created a comprehensive pedagogical framework and system with a view to delivering high quality early years education and care in any part of the world. Our schools take elements from multiple te...

Jefferson County Public Schools
3332 Newburg Road, Louisville, 40223, US
Last Update: 11/06/2026
— 30th largest school district in the U.S. — 96,000+ students — 17,400+ full- and part-time employees, including 6,800+ certified teachers Vision All JCPS students graduate prepared, empowered, and inspired to reach their full potential and contribute as thoughtful, r...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Kido







Jefferson County Public Schools






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Kido in 2026.
Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Jefferson County Public Schools in 2026.
Incident History - Kido (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Kido cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Jefferson County Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Jefferson County Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Kido

Jefferson County Public Schools
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.