Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kido UKKido UK
VS
EFEF
Kido UK

Kido UK

2A Palmer Road, Battersea, SW11 4GJ, GB

Last Update: 27/04/2026

View Profile
665/1000Weak

Kido is a place where innovation and imagination unite to create modern Early Years settings. We are international, with nurseries in India, USA and the UK. In the UK we run 15 Ofsted-rated Good and Outstanding nurseries in London and Windsor. We blend the best practice...

NAICS:61
NAICS Definition:Educational Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
EF

EF

Selnaustrasse 30, Zurich, 8001, CH

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile

Founded in 1965 in Sweden, EF (Education First) is a global association of education companies that shares a common mission of opening the world through education, offering language, academic, cultural exchange and education travel programs. Some companies are in the ...

NAICS:61
NAICS Definition:Educational Services
Employees:20,417
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kido UK

Kido UK

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
EF

EF

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kido UK in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EF in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kido UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kido UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - EF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kido UK

Kido UK

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
KID1941219100525
EF

EF

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Kido UK company and EF company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kido UK company and EF company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kido UK company and EF company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kido UK company and EF company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kido UK company and EF company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kido UK company and EF company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kido UK company and EF company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kido UK company and EF company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kido UK company and EF company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kido UK company and EF company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kido UK company and EF company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kido UK and EF, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kido UK and EF, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kido UK or EF ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kido UK or EF ?
Between Kido UK and EF, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kido UK and EF, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9