Comparison Overview

Kia America

VS

Volvo Group

Kia America

111 Peters Canyon Rd, Irvine, CA, US, 92606
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Kia America is headquartered in Irvine, California and is a subsidiary of Kia Corporation. Kia’s technology-rich product lineup of cars, SUVs, and alternative-powered vehicles are backed by the industry-leading Kia 10-year/100,000-mile limited warranty program.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 4,176
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Volvo Group

Gropegårdsgatan 2, Göteborg, SE, 417 15
Last Update: 2025-12-11

The Volvo Group is one of the world’s leading manufacturers of trucks, buses, construction equipment and marine and industrial engines. The Group also provides complete solutions for financing and service. The Volvo Group, with its headquarters in Gothenburg, employs about 100,000 people, has production facilities in 18 countries and sells its products in more than 190 markets.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 77,329
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kia-america.jpeg
Kia America
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/volvo-group.jpeg
Volvo Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kia America
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Volvo Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kia America in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Volvo Group has 400.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Kia America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kia America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Volvo Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Volvo Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kia-america.jpeg
Kia America
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Web Application
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/volvo-group.jpeg
Volvo Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial (ransomware)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: ransomware
Motivation: financial (ransomware)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: third-party vendor compromise
Motivation: financial (presumed, based on ransomware attack)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Kia America company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Volvo Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Volvo Group company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Kia America company.

In the current year, Volvo Group company has reported more cyber incidents than Kia America company.

Both Volvo Group company and Kia America company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Volvo Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Kia America company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Volvo Group company nor Kia America company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Kia America company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Volvo Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Kia America nor Volvo Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kia America company nor Volvo Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Volvo Group company employs more people globally than Kia America company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Kia America nor Volvo Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kia America nor Volvo Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kia America nor Volvo Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kia America nor Volvo Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kia America nor Volvo Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kia America nor Volvo Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N