Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group CompanyKhuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company
VS
OdebrechtOdebrecht
Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company

Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company

10 Km -ahvaz mahshahr road , AHvaz, Khouzestan, 6178813111, IR

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://faragirgroup.ir
751/1000Fair

Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company has been established on 16 January 2014 with ten billion rials capital In the form of a special share and with the approach of carrying out activities in commercial fields in order to supply raw and auxiliary material...

NAICS:5239
NAICS Definition:Other Financial Investment Activities
Employees:318
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Odebrecht

Odebrecht

Av. Luís Viana, 2841, Salvador, 41730-900, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.novonor.com.br/
783/1000Fair

Founded in 1944, Odebrecht is a Brazilian group with diverse businesses and world-class standards of quality. Its Members, guided by the Group’s own philosophy, the Odebrecht Entrepreneurial Technology (TEO), provide services and manufacture products for clients on fiv...

NAICS:5239
NAICS Definition:Other Financial Investment Activities
Employees:14,112
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company

Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Odebrecht

Odebrecht

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Odebrecht in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Odebrecht (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Odebrecht cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company

Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
KHO214616922
Odebrecht

Odebrecht

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company company and Odebrecht company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company company and Odebrecht company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company company and Odebrecht company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company company and Odebrecht company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company company and Odebrecht company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company company and Odebrecht company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company company and Odebrecht company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company company and Odebrecht company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company company and Odebrecht company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company company and Odebrecht company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company company and Odebrecht company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company and Odebrecht, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company and Odebrecht, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company or Odebrecht ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company or Odebrecht ?
Between Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company and Odebrecht, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Khuzestan Steel Pervasive Development Group Company and Odebrecht, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1