Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KFC SINGAPOREKFC SINGAPORE
VS
KFC UK & IrelandKFC UK & Ireland
KFC SINGAPORE

KFC SINGAPORE

61 Tai Seng Avenue, Singapore, 534167, SG

Last Update: 15/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.kfc.com.sg
755/1000Fair

• KFC Singapore was named one of the Top 28 Employers in 2025, highlighting its excellence in employee care and workplace culture. • Recognized for strong career development, fair benefits, and inclusive practices, making it a standout employer in the F&B industry. • ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:309
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
KFC UK & Ireland

KFC UK & Ireland

Guildford Road, Woking, Woking, GU22 7NJ , GB

Last Update: 16/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kfc.co.uk/careers
775/1000Fair

This is KFC - home of the real ones. We come to work to be ourselves, and to make something of ourselves. We bring the graft and the laughs every day - building our own community, as we serve our original recipe chicken to the ones we’re in.   In our place, ambition gr...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,727
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KFC SINGAPORE

KFC SINGAPORE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
KFC UK & Ireland

KFC UK & Ireland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food & Beverages Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KFC SINGAPORE in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food & Beverages Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KFC UK & Ireland in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KFC SINGAPORE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KFC SINGAPORE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KFC UK & Ireland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KFC UK & Ireland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KFC SINGAPORE

KFC SINGAPORE

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
KFC UK & Ireland

KFC UK & Ireland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KFC SINGAPORE company and KFC UK & Ireland company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KFC SINGAPORE company and KFC UK & Ireland company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KFC SINGAPORE company and KFC UK & Ireland company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KFC SINGAPORE company and KFC UK & Ireland company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KFC SINGAPORE company and KFC UK & Ireland company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KFC SINGAPORE company and KFC UK & Ireland company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KFC SINGAPORE company and KFC UK & Ireland company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KFC SINGAPORE company and KFC UK & Ireland company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KFC SINGAPORE company and KFC UK & Ireland company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KFC SINGAPORE company and KFC UK & Ireland company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KFC SINGAPORE company and KFC UK & Ireland company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KFC SINGAPORE and KFC UK & Ireland, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KFC SINGAPORE and KFC UK & Ireland, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KFC SINGAPORE or KFC UK & Ireland ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KFC SINGAPORE or KFC UK & Ireland ?
Between KFC SINGAPORE and KFC UK & Ireland, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KFC SINGAPORE and KFC UK & Ireland, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-108773
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in erzhongxmu JEEWMS up to 2026.09.27-W39. Impacted is the function docheck of the file src/main/java/com/zzjee/wm/controller/WmOmNoticeHController.java. Performing a manipulation of the argument goodscode results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108772
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in bleenco abstruse up to 2.1.0. This issue affects the function filepath.Join of the file server/api/worker/download_cache.go of the component Cache Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument File leads to path traversal. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-108770
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Appwrite up to 2.3.0. This vulnerability affects the function PublicHostname of the file src/Appwrite/Platform/Modules/Avatars/Http/Screenshots/Get.php of the component Browser Screenshot Service. This manipulation of the argument url causes server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 2.4.0 is able to resolve this issue. Patch name: 393255e7302ae5503331d45802e2eee01c6a47fe. You should upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-108978
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Samsung Opensource rlottie allows Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables. This issue affects rlottie: e57b094f03c39a751a1fded6f7d6c13f1ed95ec9.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-108769
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in zhayujie CowAgent up to 2.2.0. This affects an unknown part of the file Markdown.tsx of the component Markdown Rendering. The manipulation results in denial of service. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8