Comparison Overview
KFC MENAPAKT & CCA

KFC MENAPAKT & CCA
Dubai, AE
Last Update: 28/03/2026
At KFC, we proudly serve our iconic Kentucky across our vibrant markets in the MENAPAK & CCA. We bring a blend of global expertise and local flair to every meal, creating memorable experiences for families and friends. In a region where everyone, and their mamas, clai...

Jack in the Box
9357 Spectrum Center Blvd, San Diego, California, US, 92123
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Jack in the Box has always been the place for those who live outside the box. Where you can try new things and order what you want when you want it. Now, let’s get to the facts! Did you know Jack in the Box was founded on February 21, 1951, by a businessman named Robert...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

KFC MENAPAKT & CCA







Jack in the Box






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for KFC MENAPAKT & CCA in 2026.
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Jack in the Box in 2026.
Incident History - KFC MENAPAKT & CCA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
KFC MENAPAKT & CCA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Jack in the Box (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Jack in the Box cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

KFC MENAPAKT & CCA

Jack in the Box
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.