Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KFC (SG) Pte LtdKFC (SG) Pte Ltd
VS
Levy RestaurantsLevy Restaurants
KFC (SG) Pte Ltd

KFC (SG) Pte Ltd

N/A

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.kfc.com.sg/
755/1000Fair

In 2020, we are one of the 75 best companies to work for in Singapore by the Randstad Employer Brand Research | Singapore’s Best Employers by Straits Times and | 3rd Best Employer in the Restaurant Category | Top Employer conferred by Influential Brands Originality is ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:153
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Levy Restaurants

Levy Restaurants

980 N Michigan Ave, Chicago, 60611, US

Last Update: 16/09/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

Discover the Levy Difference Passion is a great gift, and we have a lot of gifted people. Our contagious enthusiasm stimulates minds, engages senses and touches hearts. Each guest is greeted with a warm welcome, served with pride and extended a heartfelt invitation t...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:11,651
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KFC (SG) Pte Ltd

KFC (SG) Pte Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Levy Restaurants

Levy Restaurants

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food & Beverages Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KFC (SG) Pte Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food & Beverages Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Levy Restaurants in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KFC (SG) Pte Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KFC (SG) Pte Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Levy Restaurants (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Levy Restaurants cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KFC (SG) Pte Ltd

KFC (SG) Pte Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Levy Restaurants

Levy Restaurants

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KFC (SG) Pte Ltd company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KFC (SG) Pte Ltd company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KFC (SG) Pte Ltd company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KFC (SG) Pte Ltd company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KFC (SG) Pte Ltd company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KFC (SG) Pte Ltd company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KFC (SG) Pte Ltd company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KFC (SG) Pte Ltd company and Levy Restaurants company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KFC (SG) Pte Ltd company and Levy Restaurants company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KFC (SG) Pte Ltd company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KFC (SG) Pte Ltd company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KFC (SG) Pte Ltd and Levy Restaurants, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KFC (SG) Pte Ltd and Levy Restaurants, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KFC (SG) Pte Ltd or Levy Restaurants ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KFC (SG) Pte Ltd or Levy Restaurants ?
Between KFC (SG) Pte Ltd and Levy Restaurants, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KFC (SG) Pte Ltd and Levy Restaurants, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-22061
SUMMARY

Trident versions v25.02.1 through v26.06.1 are susceptible to a vulnerability that could allow an authenticated attacker with access to debug logs to view LUKS passphrases or SMB Active Directory credentials.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108269
SUMMARY

Remote Attestation TLS Clients provides multi-language utilities for verifying attested TLS connections. Prior to 0.5.0, the Rust and Go RA-TLS challenge verifiers accepted quote ReportData that was bound to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session before permitting application traffic. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing the clients to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in 0.5.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108268
SUMMARY

Enclave OS Virtual runs container workloads inside confidential virtual machines with end-to-end attestation. Prior to tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27, the TDX/GPU RA-TLS certificate issuer placed the certificate public-key hash and client nonce in quote ReportData but omitted a value bound to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108267
SUMMARY

Privasys Go is a maintained fork of the Go programming language that adds RA-TLS support to crypto/tls. Prior to privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5, challenge-mode RA-TLS certificates bound quote ReportData to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept a handshake terminated by the attacker as an attested enclave connection. This issue is fixed in privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-92705
SUMMARY

Aegisub is a cross-platform advanced subtitle editor. From 3.2.0 to 3.4.2, Aegisub automatically loads Automation scripts referenced by `Automation Scripts` metadata in `ASS` subtitle projects without asking whether the user trusts the scripts or their authors. An attacker can distribute a crafted `ASS` file together with a referenced malicious Automation script, and opening the `AS`  file executes arbitrary code with the privileges of the Aegisub process. From 3.4.0 to 3.4.2, inconsistent handling of embedded `NUL` characters between extension validation and filesystem operations additionally allows a crafted `ASS/Lua` polyglot to reference and execute itself as a single-file variant. The vulnerability is fixed in Aegisub 3.5.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8