Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AVKerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV
VS
FoxconnFoxconn
Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV

Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV

Louis Armstrongweg 50, Almere, Flevoland, 1311, NL

Last Update: 29/11/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.keren.nl
744/1000Moderate

Kerèn Presentatie Systemen is al ruim 15 jaar één van de grootste gespecialiseerde importeurs / distributeurs van Nederland op het gebied van presentatie apparatuur voor professioneel, zakelijk en educatief gebruik. Onze producten worden uitsluitend geleverd via profess...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Foxconn

Foxconn

US

Last Update: 18/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.foxconn.com
547/1000Critical

Established in Taiwan in 1974, Hon Hai Technology Group (Foxconn) (2317: Taiwan) is the world’s largest electronics manufacturer. Foxconn is also the leading technological solution provider, and it continuously leverages its expertise in software and hardware to integra...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:96,074
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV

Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Foxconn

Foxconn

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Foxconn has 277.36% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Foxconn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foxconn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV

Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Foxconn

Foxconn

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
GOOFOXAPP1778617574
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UNIWESFOX1780562007
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ANTFOX7-ECARGIT1781576848

FAQ

Between Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV company and Foxconn company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV company and Foxconn company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV company and Foxconn company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV company and Foxconn company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV company and Foxconn company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV and Foxconn, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV and Foxconn, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV or Foxconn ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV or Foxconn ?
Between Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV and Foxconn, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kerèn Presentatie Systemen - Exertis AV and Foxconn, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA