Comparison Overview
KENZO Parfums

KENZO Parfums
Paris, FR
Last Update: 11/03/2026
After leaving Japan in 1964, the young designer Kenzo Takada sailed for France and settled in Paris. By 1970 he had opened his first store and followed many years during which his Japanese and colorful style defied the fashion rules of his time. In 1988, he continued t...

O Boticário
Av. Rui Barbosa, 4.110, Parque das Fontes,, São José dos Pinhais, 83.050-010, BR
Last Update: 04/04/2026
A beleza transforma, encanta, conquista e também pode ser conquistada. Eis o ideal de beleza que O Boticário multiplica com seus produtos, lojas e em sua relação com o público. Desde 1977, O Boticário soma inspiração, ousadia, inovação e qualidade, despertando o respei...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

KENZO Parfums







O Boticário






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for KENZO Parfums in 2026.
Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for O Boticário in 2026.
Incident History - KENZO Parfums (X = Date, Y = Severity)
KENZO Parfums cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - O Boticário (X = Date, Y = Severity)
O Boticário cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

KENZO Parfums

O Boticário
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.