Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KENZO ParfumsKENZO Parfums
VS
Grupo BoticárioGrupo Boticário
KENZO Parfums

KENZO Parfums

Paris, FR

Last Update: 11/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kenzoparfums.com
760/1000Fair

After leaving Japan in 1964, the young designer Kenzo Takada sailed for France and settled in Paris. By 1970 he had opened his first store and followed many years during which his Japanese and colorful style defied the fashion rules of his time. In 1988, he continued t...

NAICS:32562
NAICS Definition:Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo Boticário

Grupo Boticário

Avenida Doutor Dário Lopes dos Santos 2197, Curitiba, Paraná, BR, 80210-010

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
817/1000Good

Beleza é o negócio do Grupo Boticário. Para nós, ela se traduz em nossas quatro unidades de negócio com atuação no setor cosmético: O Boticário, Eudora, quem disse, berenice? e The Beauty Box. A beleza também está no empreendedorismo, na sustentabilidade, inovação, étic...

NAICS:32562
NAICS Definition:Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees:47,163
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KENZO Parfums

KENZO Parfums

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Boticário

Grupo Boticário

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KENZO Parfums in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Boticário in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KENZO Parfums (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KENZO Parfums cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Boticário (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Boticário cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KENZO Parfums

KENZO Parfums

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo Boticário

Grupo Boticário

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KENZO Parfums company and Grupo Boticário company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KENZO Parfums company and Grupo Boticário company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KENZO Parfums company and Grupo Boticário company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KENZO Parfums company and Grupo Boticário company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KENZO Parfums company and Grupo Boticário company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KENZO Parfums company and Grupo Boticário company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KENZO Parfums company and Grupo Boticário company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KENZO Parfums company and Grupo Boticário company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KENZO Parfums company and Grupo Boticário company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KENZO Parfums company and Grupo Boticário company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KENZO Parfums company and Grupo Boticário company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KENZO Parfums and Grupo Boticário, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KENZO Parfums and Grupo Boticário, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KENZO Parfums or Grupo Boticário ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KENZO Parfums or Grupo Boticário ?
Between KENZO Parfums and Grupo Boticário, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KENZO Parfums and Grupo Boticário, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2