Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KentuckyOne HealthKentuckyOne Health
VS
Memorial Hermann Health SystemMemorial Hermann Health System
KentuckyOne Health

KentuckyOne Health

200 Abraham Flexner Way, Louisville, 40202, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
719/1000Moderate

About KentuckyOne Health KentuckyOne Health, one of the largest and most comprehensive health systems in the Commonwealth, has more than 200 locations, including hospitals, physician groups, clinics, primary care centers, specialty institutes and home health agencies ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:726
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial Hermann Health System

Houston, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

Advancing Health. Personalizing Care. Memorial Hermann Health System is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. A fully integrated health system with more than 260 care delivery sites throughout the Greater Houston area...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:19,509
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KentuckyOne Health

KentuckyOne Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial Hermann Health System

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KentuckyOne Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Memorial Hermann Health System in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KentuckyOne Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KentuckyOne Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Memorial Hermann Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Memorial Hermann Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KentuckyOne Health

KentuckyOne Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KEN1494123
🔒 Incident : Breach
KEN1494123
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial Hermann Health System

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MEM12145522
🔒 Incident : Breach
MEM308071625

FAQ

Between KentuckyOne Health company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KentuckyOne Health and Memorial Hermann Health System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KentuckyOne Health and Memorial Hermann Health System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KentuckyOne Health or Memorial Hermann Health System ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KentuckyOne Health or Memorial Hermann Health System ?
Between KentuckyOne Health and Memorial Hermann Health System, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KentuckyOne Health and Memorial Hermann Health System, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2