Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KentuckyOne HealthKentuckyOne Health
VS
Corewell HealthCorewell Health
KentuckyOne Health

KentuckyOne Health

200 Abraham Flexner Way, Louisville, 40202, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
719/1000Moderate

About KentuckyOne Health KentuckyOne Health, one of the largest and most comprehensive health systems in the Commonwealth, has more than 200 locations, including hospitals, physician groups, clinics, primary care centers, specialty institutes and home health agencies ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:726
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Corewell Health

Corewell Health

N/A

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://corewellhealth.org
513/1000Critical

People are at the heart of everything we do, and the inspiration for our legacy of outstanding outcomes, innovation, strong community partnerships, philanthropy and transparency. Corewell Health is a not-for-profit health system that provides health care and coverage wi...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:41,961
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KentuckyOne Health

KentuckyOne Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Corewell Health

Corewell Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KentuckyOne Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Corewell Health has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - KentuckyOne Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KentuckyOne Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Corewell Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corewell Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KentuckyOne Health

KentuckyOne Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KEN1494123
🔒 Incident : Breach
KEN1494123
Corewell Health

Corewell Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
OLECOR1774664850
🔒 Incident : Breach
HEACOR1774651954
🔒 Incident : Breach
PINCOR1774758354

FAQ

Between KentuckyOne Health company and Corewell Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Corewell Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Corewell Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Corewell Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Corewell Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Corewell Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Corewell Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Corewell Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Corewell Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Corewell Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KentuckyOne Health company and Corewell Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KentuckyOne Health and Corewell Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KentuckyOne Health and Corewell Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KentuckyOne Health or Corewell Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KentuckyOne Health or Corewell Health ?
Between KentuckyOne Health and Corewell Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KentuckyOne Health and Corewell Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1