Comparison Overview
Kentucky Power

Kentucky Power
Ashland , US
Last Update: 07/03/2026
We are an electric company that believes the power to make a difference is in all our hands. Together with our communities, we are working to create bright futures and economic opportunities for the 20 counties and 165,000 customers we serve on the eastern edge of the B...

E.ON
Brüsseler Platz 1, Essen, 45131, DE
Last Update: 09/09/2026
We are one of Europe's largest energy companies with the business areas of energy networks, energy infrastructure solutions and energy sales. It’s on us to make new energy work, and we are actively leading energy’s future – putting our customers first and delivering inn...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Kentucky Power







E.ON






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Kentucky Power in 2026.
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for E.ON in 2026.
Incident History - Kentucky Power (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Kentucky Power cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - E.ON (X = Date, Y = Severity)
E.ON cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Kentucky Power

E.ON
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.