Company Details
kennedys-bermuda
None employees
74,007
5411
kennedyslaw.com
0
KEN_4209223
In-progress

Kennedys Bermuda Company CyberSecurity Posture
kennedyslaw.comThe Bermuda office of the global firm Kennedys is one of the leading commercial law firms in Bermuda. Our insurance and dispute resolution partners have extensive experience advising clients on some of the largest and most complex legal issues facing insurers, reinsurers, banks, investment funds, trustees, companies, shareholders and financial and professional service providers. Our insolvency team advises on a wide range of domestic and cross border insolvency procedures, restructurings and corporate reorganisations. Our corporate and finance partners have been involved in some of the most complex and ground-breaking transactions in Bermuda, regularly advising banks, insurers, other financial institutions, borrowers and overseas and domestic investors on all aspects of their businesses.
Company Details
kennedys-bermuda
None employees
74,007
5411
kennedyslaw.com
0
KEN_4209223
In-progress
Between 750 and 799

Kennedys Bermuda Global Score (TPRM)XXXX

Description: Kennedys Law, a London-based law firm, accidentally leaked the email addresses of **194 individuals and law firms** involved in the Church of England’s (CoE) redress scheme for victims of abuse. The breach occurred due to **human error**, exposing recipients' details to all addressees in a mass email. Attempts to recall the emails were **only partially successful**, leaving victims—many of whom had suffered historical abuse by CoE officials—vulnerable to further harm. The firm reported the incident to regulatory bodies (Charity Commission, ICO, Solicitors Regulation Authority) and launched an internal investigation. The CoE, though not the data controller, expressed deep concern, emphasizing the breach’s potential to **erode trust** in the redress process. The exposed individuals included survivors of abuse by priests and bishops, compounding their trauma. The firm apologized unreservedly, acknowledging the **significant emotional and reputational impact** on those affected.


No incidents recorded for Kennedys Bermuda in 2025.
No incidents recorded for Kennedys Bermuda in 2025.
No incidents recorded for Kennedys Bermuda in 2025.
Kennedys Bermuda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

The Bermuda office of the global firm Kennedys is one of the leading commercial law firms in Bermuda. Our insurance and dispute resolution partners have extensive experience advising clients on some of the largest and most complex legal issues facing insurers, reinsurers, banks, investment funds, trustees, companies, shareholders and financial and professional service providers. Our insolvency team advises on a wide range of domestic and cross border insolvency procedures, restructurings and corporate reorganisations. Our corporate and finance partners have been involved in some of the most complex and ground-breaking transactions in Bermuda, regularly advising banks, insurers, other financial institutions, borrowers and overseas and domestic investors on all aspects of their businesses.


DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver exceptional outcomes on cross-border

Integrated legal solutions to complex business challenges. The global business community is more interconnected than ever before. Opportunities and risks spill across different markets, sectors and areas of law. A connected perspective is essential in delivering business objectives while mitigating
.png)
Recent high-profile attacks on major retailers have underscored the growing cyber risks facing the sector, as threat actors exploit both...
Bermuda is an established offshore financial centre and has enjoyed a long history of political, economic and social stability.
As we enter 2025, one word defines the cybersecurity landscape: resilience. For those hoping for a breather from the flood of new cyber...
We expect that in 2025 the global focus on children's online safety, and digital well-being will continue to grow, underpinned by regulatory...
On 25 November 2024, the Australian Government passed the Cyber Security Act 2024 (Cth) as part of a suite of cyber security legislation,...
Kennedys' report summarising a series of updates on cyber issues and major regulatory developments impacting the APAC region to mark...
The announcement of the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill in the King's Speech demonstrates a commitment by the new government to develop...
We welcome high-performing lawyers, business services professionals, secretaries, trainees and apprentices to join our rapidly expanding global firm.
The Kennedys 2022 Bermuda Hot Topics Seminar attracted 147 re/insurance professionals to the Bermuda Underwater Exploration Institute.

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
The official website of Kennedys Bermuda is https://kennedyslaw.com/en/where-we-are/north-america/bermuda/.
According to Rankiteo, Kennedys Bermuda’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 764, reflecting their Fair security posture.
According to Rankiteo, Kennedys Bermuda currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
According to Rankiteo, Kennedys Bermuda is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
According to Rankiteo, Kennedys Bermuda does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
According to Rankiteo, Kennedys Bermuda is not listed as GDPR compliant.
According to Rankiteo, Kennedys Bermuda does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
According to Rankiteo, Kennedys Bermuda is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
According to Rankiteo,Kennedys Bermuda is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Kennedys Bermuda operates primarily in the Legal Services industry.
Kennedys Bermuda employs approximately None employees people worldwide.
Kennedys Bermuda presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Kennedys Bermuda’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 74,007 followers.
Kennedys Bermuda is classified under the NAICS code 5411, which corresponds to Legal Services.
No, Kennedys Bermuda does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Yes, Kennedys Bermuda maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/kennedys-bermuda.
As of November 30, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Kennedys Bermuda has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Kennedys Bermuda has an estimated 7,389 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with attempted email recall (partially successful), and remediation measures with internal investigation, remediation measures with regulatory reporting (ico, charity commission, sra), remediation measures with apology and communication with affected parties, and recovery measures with incorporating learnings immediately, and communication strategy with public apology, communication strategy with direct contact with affected individuals, communication strategy with statements to media..
Title: Kennedys Law Email Data Leak Affecting Church of England Redress Scheme Applicants
Description: Kennedys Law, a London-based law firm, accidentally leaked the email addresses of 194 individuals and law firms who had requested updates about the Church of England (CoE) redress scheme for abuse victims. The leak occurred due to human error when email addresses were exposed to all recipients in a mass email. Attempts to recall the emails were only partially successful. The firm has apologized, launched an internal investigation, and reported the incident to regulatory bodies including the Charity Commission, the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), and the Solicitor's Regulatory Authority (SRA).
Type: data breach
Attack Vector: human error (misuse of email CC/BCC fields)
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

Data Compromised: Email addresses
Systems Affected: email system
Operational Impact: partial email recall failureregulatory reportinginternal investigation
Customer Complaints: ['hurt and concern expressed by affected individuals']
Brand Reputation Impact: loss of trust among abuse victimsnegative publicity for Kennedys Law and Church of England
Legal Liabilities: potential investigations by ICO, Charity Commission, and SRA
Identity Theft Risk: ['low (email addresses only)']
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Email Addresses and .

Entity Name: Kennedys Law
Entity Type: law firm
Industry: legal services
Location: London, UK
Customers Affected: 194 individuals and law firms

Entity Name: Church of England (CoE) Redress Scheme Applicants
Entity Type: victims/survivors group
Location: UK (primarily)
Customers Affected: 194

Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Containment Measures: attempted email recall (partially successful)
Remediation Measures: internal investigationregulatory reporting (ICO, Charity Commission, SRA)apology and communication with affected parties
Recovery Measures: incorporating learnings immediately
Communication Strategy: public apologydirect contact with affected individualsstatements to media

Type of Data Compromised: Email addresses
Number of Records Exposed: 194
Sensitivity of Data: moderate (personal contact information of abuse victims)
Personally Identifiable Information: email addresses
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: internal investigation, regulatory reporting (ICO, Charity Commission, SRA), apology and communication with affected parties, .
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by attempted email recall (partially successful) and .
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through incorporating learnings immediately, .

Regulations Violated: UK GDPR (potential), Data Protection Act 2018 (potential),
Legal Actions: investigations by ICO, Charity Commission, and SRA (pending),
Regulatory Notifications: reported to ICO, Charity Commission, and SRA
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through investigations by ICO, Charity Commission, and SRA (pending), .

Lessons Learned: importance of email etiquette (CC/BCC usage), need for robust data handling procedures for sensitive cases, immediate recall actions may not fully mitigate leaks

Recommendations: mandatory training on email best practices (CC/BCC), implementation of technical controls to prevent mass email leaks (e.g., forced BCC for bulk emails), enhanced oversight for communications involving vulnerable groups, regular audits of data handling proceduresmandatory training on email best practices (CC/BCC), implementation of technical controls to prevent mass email leaks (e.g., forced BCC for bulk emails), enhanced oversight for communications involving vulnerable groups, regular audits of data handling proceduresmandatory training on email best practices (CC/BCC), implementation of technical controls to prevent mass email leaks (e.g., forced BCC for bulk emails), enhanced oversight for communications involving vulnerable groups, regular audits of data handling proceduresmandatory training on email best practices (CC/BCC), implementation of technical controls to prevent mass email leaks (e.g., forced BCC for bulk emails), enhanced oversight for communications involving vulnerable groups, regular audits of data handling procedures
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are importance of email etiquette (CC/BCC usage),need for robust data handling procedures for sensitive cases,immediate recall actions may not fully mitigate leaks.

Source: The Register

Source: Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) 2022 Report

Source: Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) guidance on email security
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: The Register, and Source: Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) 2022 Report, and Source: Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) guidance on email security.

Investigation Status: ongoing (internal investigation by Kennedys Law; regulatory reviews by ICO, Charity Commission, and SRA)
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Apology, Direct Contact With Affected Individuals and Statements To Media.

Stakeholder Advisories: Church Of England Expressed Concern And Is Monitoring The Situation.
Customer Advisories: direct communication with affected individuals by Kennedys Law
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Church Of England Expressed Concern And Is Monitoring The Situation, Direct Communication With Affected Individuals By Kennedys Law and .

Root Causes: Human Error In Email Handling (Cc Instead Of Bcc), Lack Of Technical Safeguards To Prevent Mass Email Leaks,
Corrective Actions: Incorporating Learnings Immediately (Unspecified), Potential Policy/Training Updates,
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Incorporating Learnings Immediately (Unspecified), Potential Policy/Training Updates, .
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were email addresses and .
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was email system.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was attempted email recall (partially successful).
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was email addresses.
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 194.0.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was investigations by ICO, Charity Commission, and SRA (pending), .
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was immediate recall actions may not fully mitigate leaks.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was enhanced oversight for communications involving vulnerable groups, mandatory training on email best practices (CC/BCC), implementation of technical controls to prevent mass email leaks (e.g., forced BCC for bulk emails) and regular audits of data handling procedures.
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) 2022 Report, Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) guidance on email security and The Register.
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is ongoing (internal investigation by Kennedys Law; regulatory reviews by ICO, Charity Commission, and SRA).
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Church of England expressed concern and is monitoring the situation, .
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an direct communication with affected individuals by Kennedys Law.
.png)
A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.
OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.
OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.
OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Get company history
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.