Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kelley Blue BookKelley Blue Book
VS
BYDBYD
Kelley Blue Book

Kelley Blue Book

195 Technology Drive, Irvine, 92618, US

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://b2b.kbb.com/
749/1000Moderate

Founded in 1926, Kelley Blue Book, The Trusted Resource®, is the vehicle valuation and information source trusted and relied upon by both consumers and the automotive industry. Each week the company provides market-reflective values on its top-rated website KBB.com, inc...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:443
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BYD

BYD

No.3009, BYD Road, Pingshan, Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN, 518118

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bydglobal.com
825/1000Good

Established in 1995, BYD is a top high-tech enterprise in China specializing in IT, automobile, and new energy.BYD is the largest supplier of rechargeable batteries in the globe, and has the largest market share for Nickel-cadmium batteries, handset Li-ion batteries, ce...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:24,942
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kelley Blue Book

Kelley Blue Book

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BYD

BYD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kelley Blue Book in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

BYD has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Kelley Blue Book (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kelley Blue Book cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BYD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BYD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kelley Blue Book

Kelley Blue Book

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BYD

BYD

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
BYD1789993911

FAQ

Between Kelley Blue Book company and BYD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kelley Blue Book company and BYD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kelley Blue Book company and BYD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kelley Blue Book company and BYD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kelley Blue Book company and BYD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kelley Blue Book company and BYD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kelley Blue Book company and BYD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kelley Blue Book company and BYD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kelley Blue Book company and BYD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kelley Blue Book company and BYD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kelley Blue Book company and BYD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kelley Blue Book and BYD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kelley Blue Book and BYD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kelley Blue Book or BYD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kelley Blue Book or BYD ?
Between Kelley Blue Book and BYD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kelley Blue Book and BYD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA