Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kearny BankKearny Bank
VS
NordeaNordea
Kearny Bank

Kearny Bank

120 Passaic Avenue, Fairfield, 07004, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.kearnybank.com
719/1000Moderate

The finest traditions of community banking combined with the industry’s latest, most effective financial products and services. That’s Kearny Bank – founded back in 1884, and always committed to helping our neighbors. We treat each with dignity and respect, exceed expec...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:509
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Nordea

Nordea

Aleksanterinkatu 36 B, Helsinki, FI

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.nordea.com
815/1000Good

We are a universal bank with a 200-year history of supporting and growing the Nordic economies – enabling dreams and aspirations for a greater good. Every day, we work to support our customers’ financial development, delivering best-in-class omnichannel customer experie...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:29,591
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kearny Bank

Kearny Bank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nordea

Nordea

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kearny Bank in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nordea in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kearny Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kearny Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nordea (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nordea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kearny Bank

Kearny Bank

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KEA356072525
Nordea

Nordea

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Kearny Bank company and Nordea company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kearny Bank company and Nordea company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kearny Bank company and Nordea company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kearny Bank company and Nordea company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kearny Bank company and Nordea company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kearny Bank company and Nordea company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kearny Bank company and Nordea company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kearny Bank company and Nordea company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kearny Bank company and Nordea company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kearny Bank company and Nordea company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kearny Bank company and Nordea company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kearny Bank and Nordea, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kearny Bank and Nordea, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kearny Bank or Nordea ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kearny Bank or Nordea ?
Between Kearny Bank and Nordea, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kearny Bank and Nordea, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA