Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kommando CyberKommando Cyber
VS
Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationaleDepartment of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale
Kommando Cyber

Kommando Cyber

N/A

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Das Kommando Cyber (Kdo Cy) steht für Kompetenz in den Bereichen Cyber und Digitalisierung. Wir sind mystisch, komplex, nicht greifbar und doch vereinen wir die Begeisterung für unsere Aufgabe mit Knowhow, Innovation, modernsten Technologien und agilen Arbeitsweisen. Wi...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:48
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale

Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale

66 Moodie Dr, Ottawa, Ontario, CA, K2H

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.canada.ca/
777/1000Fair

The Department of National Defence (DND) is a Canadian government department responsible for defending Canada's interests and values at home and abroad, as well as contributing to international peace and security. DND is the largest department of the Government of Canad...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:28,038
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kommando Cyber

Kommando Cyber

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale

Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kommando Cyber in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kommando Cyber (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kommando Cyber cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kommando Cyber

Kommando Cyber

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale

Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEP32110622

FAQ

Between Kommando Cyber company and Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kommando Cyber company and Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kommando Cyber company and Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kommando Cyber company and Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kommando Cyber company and Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kommando Cyber company and Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kommando Cyber company and Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kommando Cyber company and Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kommando Cyber company and Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kommando Cyber company and Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kommando Cyber company and Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kommando Cyber and Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kommando Cyber and Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kommando Cyber or Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kommando Cyber or Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale ?
Between Kommando Cyber and Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kommando Cyber and Department of National Defence/Ministère de la défense nationale, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1