Comparison Overview
Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회

Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회
N/A
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD), in collaboration with the Korea Exchange (KRX) is committed to enhancing corporate governance and protectinginancial consumers in South Korea and Global KCCD provides corporate boards with strategic guidance to strengthen tr...

Acosta Group
6600 Corporate Center Pkwy, Jacksonville, 32216, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Acosta Group fuses storied expertise, unmatched connectivity and advanced insight to accelerate brand growth – everywhere you sell. Our collective of the most trusted retail, marketing and foodservice agencies is reimagining how people connect with brands at every point...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회







Acosta Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 in 2026.
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Acosta Group in 2026.
Incident History - Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Acosta Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Acosta Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회

Acosta Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.