Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kazakhtelecom JSCKazakhtelecom JSC
VS
PTCL.OfficialPTCL.Official
Kazakhtelecom JSC

Kazakhtelecom JSC

район Есиль, ул. Сауран 12, Нур-Султан, 010000 , KZ

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.telecom.kz
826/1000Good

JSC «Kazakhtelecom», the national carrier of Kazakhstan and one of the fastest growing telecommunications companies in the former Soviet Union, provides a broad spectrum of infocomm services. The central office is located in the capital of Kazakhstan - Astana. The com...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:767
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
PTCL.Official

PTCL.Official

Block-E, Sector G-8/4, Islamabad, 44000, PK

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ptcl.com.pk
793/1000Fair

𝗩𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻: To be the leading and most admired Telecom and ICT provider in and for Pakistan. 𝐌𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧: To be the partner of choice for our customers, to develop our people and to deliver value to our shareholders. 𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗽𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲𝘀: Be resilie...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:22,945
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kazakhtelecom JSC

Kazakhtelecom JSC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PTCL.Official

PTCL.Official

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kazakhtelecom JSC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PTCL.Official in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kazakhtelecom JSC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kazakhtelecom JSC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PTCL.Official (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PTCL.Official cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kazakhtelecom JSC

Kazakhtelecom JSC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
KAZ0632406092725
PTCL.Official

PTCL.Official

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Kazakhtelecom JSC company and PTCL.Official company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kazakhtelecom JSC company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kazakhtelecom JSC company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kazakhtelecom JSC company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kazakhtelecom JSC company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kazakhtelecom JSC company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kazakhtelecom JSC company and PTCL.Official company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kazakhtelecom JSC company and PTCL.Official company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kazakhtelecom JSC company and PTCL.Official company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kazakhtelecom JSC company and PTCL.Official company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kazakhtelecom JSC company and PTCL.Official company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kazakhtelecom JSC and PTCL.Official, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kazakhtelecom JSC and PTCL.Official, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kazakhtelecom JSC or PTCL.Official ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kazakhtelecom JSC or PTCL.Official ?
Between Kazakhtelecom JSC and PTCL.Official, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kazakhtelecom JSC and PTCL.Official, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2