Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kativik Regional GovernmentKativik Regional Government
VS
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
Kativik Regional Government

Kativik Regional Government

Kuujjuaq, J0M1C0, CA

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.krg.ca/
719/1000Moderate

The Kativik Regional Government is a non-ethnic public organization created in 1978, under the James Bay and Northern Québec Agreement. The organization has jurisdiction over nearly the entire territory of Québec north of the 55th parallel in areas such as municipal mat...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:190
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

601 12th Street South, Arlington, 22202, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tsa.gov
786/1000Fair

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is a component agency of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), committed to securing the nation’s transportation systems to ensure safe and efficient travel for all. Our mission is to protect the American people...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,302
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kativik Regional Government

Kativik Regional Government

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kativik Regional Government in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kativik Regional Government (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kativik Regional Government cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Transportation Security Administration (TSA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kativik Regional Government

Kativik Regional Government

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KAT2329723
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Kativik Regional Government company and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kativik Regional Government company and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kativik Regional Government company and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kativik Regional Government company and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kativik Regional Government company and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kativik Regional Government company and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kativik Regional Government company and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kativik Regional Government company and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kativik Regional Government company and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kativik Regional Government company and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kativik Regional Government company and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kativik Regional Government and Transportation Security Administration (TSA), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kativik Regional Government and Transportation Security Administration (TSA), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kativik Regional Government or Transportation Security Administration (TSA) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kativik Regional Government or Transportation Security Administration (TSA) ?
Between Kativik Regional Government and Transportation Security Administration (TSA), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kativik Regional Government and Transportation Security Administration (TSA), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1