Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Kaspersky

Kaspersky Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

kaspersky.com

Our mission is simple – building a safer world. And in fulfilling that mission we aim to become the global leader in cybersecurity – by securing technology to make sure that the possibilities it brings become opportunities for each and every one of us. Bring on endless possibilities. Bring on a safer tomorrow.” - Eugene Kaspersky, CEO of Kaspersky https://www.kaspersky.com/about/company


Kaspersky A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Kaspersky
Company Information
Website:https://kaspersky.com/
Employees number:4,470
Number of followers:528,510
NAICS:541514
Industry Type:Computer and Network Security
Homepage:kaspersky.com
Kaspersky Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 650 and 699
logo
KasperskyComputer and Network Security
Updated:
01/06/2026
665/1000
Weak
B
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Kaspersky Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
KasperskyComputer and Network Security
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Kaspersky
KasperskyWeak
Current Score
665B (WEAK)
01000
10 incidents
-4 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
669Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Jun 2026Kaspersky
Unnamed VPN Vendor: Race Against Time: Why Faster Vulnerability Alerts Matter

Critical RCE Vulnerability in Widely Used VPN Exploited Within 24 Hours of Disclosure

665After Incident
CRITICAL-4
KAS1780323996
Critical RCE Vulnerability in Widely Used VPN Exploited Within 24 Hours of Disclosure A recently disclosed remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in a popular VPN application was exploited by attackers within 24 hours of its public release. The flaw allowed threat actors to gain unauthorized access to corporate networks, with internal monitoring tools eventually detecting suspicious activity. By the time organizations received official vulnerability alerts, the damage had already been done highlighting a growing gap in threat response times. The incident underscores a broader trend in cybersecurity: the median time from vulnerability disclosure to exploitation has plummeted from 4.2 months in 2023 to just 1.6 days as of 2025. Over the same period, new vulnerabilities surged by 67%, while exploited flaws increased by 30%. These shifts place immense pressure on businesses, particularly those without mature vulnerability management processes, as delayed patching or missed alerts can lead to costly breaches. Traditional vulnerability tracking methods such as relying solely on the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) are proving inadequate. The NVD has faced significant delays in publishing updates and has deprioritized lower-severity vulnerabilities due to overwhelming volume. Meanwhile, in-house teams often struggle to monitor the thousands of software components in use, leaving critical gaps in threat detection. To address these challenges, some organizations are adopting real-time vulnerability alerting services that source intelligence directly from vendors and security researchers, bypassing NVD delays. These platforms allow businesses to filter alerts by severity, software relevance, and exploitation status, ensuring security teams focus on the most urgent threats. Alerts can be delivered via email, Slack, Teams, or other integrations, with customizable frequencies ranging from hourly to monthly. Advanced tools also provide risk insights, identifying high-risk software and trending vulnerabilities, which can be exported for auditing or reporting. While historically reserved for large enterprises, such solutions are now accessible to businesses of all sizes, offering a cost-effective layer of defense against rapidly evolving threats. The incident serves as a stark reminder that in cybersecurity, speed is the defining factor attackers are moving faster than ever, and organizations must adapt to close the window between disclosure and exploitation.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
RCE (Remote Code Execution)
IMPACT
Systems Affected: Corporate networksOperational Impact: Unauthorized access to corporate networks
MAY 2026
668Before Incident
APRIL 2026
666Before Incident
MARCH 2026
662Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
730Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
660Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Jan 2026Kaspersky
ExifTool: ExifTool Vulnerability Lets Malicious Images Trigger macOS Code Execution

Critical ExifTool Vulnerability Exposes macOS Systems to Code Execution via Malicious Images

727After Incident
CRITICAL-67
KAS1773044624
Critical ExifTool Vulnerability Exposes macOS Systems to Code Execution via Malicious Images A severe vulnerability in ExifTool, a widely used open-source utility for reading and editing image metadata, has been discovered, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code on macOS systems through specially crafted image files. Tracked as CVE-2026-3102, the flaw was uncovered by Kaspersky’s Global Research and Analysis Team (GReAT) and affects ExifTool versions 13.49 and earlier. ### How the Exploit Works ExifTool processes metadata such as timestamps, GPS coordinates, and camera details embedded in image files. The vulnerability stems from how the tool handles the DateTimeOriginal field, which stores the time a photo was taken. If this field contains malformed date values disguised as shell commands, macOS systems running vulnerable ExifTool versions can execute them under two conditions: 1. The system must be running macOS. 2. ExifTool must be executed with the `-n` (or `--printConv`) flag, which outputs raw numerical data without conversion. When triggered, the exploit allows attackers to download and execute payloads, including Trojans, infostealers, or backdoors, compromising the system. ### Potential Attack Scenarios Given ExifTool’s integration into digital asset management platforms, image editors, and automated processing scripts, the vulnerability poses a significant risk. A likely attack vector involves journalists, law firms, or analysts receiving an image for processing such as a photo for a news story or forensic investigation only for their system to automatically execute malicious code upon metadata extraction. ### Mitigation and Response The ExifTool developer released version 13.50 to patch the flaw. Users and organizations are advised to: - Upgrade to ExifTool 13.50 or later immediately. - Verify third-party software (e.g., photo editors, DAM systems) for embedded outdated ExifTool libraries. - Audit automated image-processing scripts to ensure they reference the patched version. - Isolate untrusted image processing in virtual environments or sandboxes to limit potential damage. While macOS has historically been perceived as less vulnerable to such attacks, this incident underscores the risks of software supply chain threats, where even seemingly benign files like images can serve as attack vectors.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability Exploitation
IMPACT
Systems Affected: macOS systems running ExifTool versions 13.49 and earlierOperational Impact: Potential arbitrary code execution leading to system compromise
DATA BREACH
Image files (e.g., JPEG, PNG)
DECEMBER 2025
660Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
657Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
654Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
651Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
648Before Incident
JULY 2025
645Before Incident
JUNE 2025
645Before Incident
Vulnerability
15 Jun 2025Kaspersky
Kaspersky: Mustang Panda’s Novel Kernel-Mode Rootkit Used in Mid-2025 Cyber Attack Analysis

Mustang Panda's Kernel-Mode Rootkit and TONESHELL Backdoor Attack

641After Incident
LOW-4
KAS1767173698
Mustang Panda Deploys Undocumented Kernel-Mode Rootkit in Targeted Cyber Espionage Campaign In mid-2025, the Chinese state-linked hacking group Mustang Panda deployed a previously undocumented kernel-mode rootkit driver to distribute a new variant of the TONESHELL backdoor, targeting an entity in Asia. The discovery, detailed by Kaspersky’s cybersecurity researchers, reveals a significant escalation in the group’s cyber espionage capabilities. The attack leveraged the kernel-mode rootkit to establish deep system persistence, operating at a privileged level that evades standard detection methods. By embedding itself within the system’s kernel, the rootkit effectively concealed the TONESHELL backdoor, which enabled remote access, arbitrary command execution, and the exfiltration of sensitive data—all while minimizing early detection risks. Kaspersky’s analysis underscores the sophistication of Mustang Panda’s tactics, particularly the rootkit’s ability to obfuscate malicious activity and complicate defensive responses. The TONESHELL variant further amplifies the threat by providing attackers with a stealthy communication channel for sustained infiltration. This campaign highlights the growing challenge of kernel-level threats, as adversaries increasingly exploit low-level system access to bypass traditional security measures. The incident serves as a critical case study in the evolution of advanced persistent threats (APTs), emphasizing the need for enhanced detection and mitigation strategies at the kernel layer.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyber Espionage
MOTIVATION
Cyber Espionage
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Sensitive data
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Sensitive dataSensitivity Of Data: High
JUNE 2025
663Before Incident
Cyber Attack
10 Jun 2025Kaspersky
Kaspersky: Experts warn GTA and Minecraft being used to lure in cyberattack victims - here's how to stay safe

Millions of Game-Themed Malware Variants Targeting Gamers

644After Incident
LOW-19
KAS1768378398
Millions of Gamers Targeted by Malware Disguised as Popular Game Content Cybersecurity researchers at Kaspersky have uncovered a widespread malware campaign exploiting popular video games to infect millions of gamers, particularly younger users. Between April 1, 2024, and March 31, 2025, attackers made over 19 million attempts to distribute malicious files disguised as game-related content, potentially affecting 400,000 people worldwide. The most abused titles included Grand Theft Auto V (GTA), Minecraft, Call of Duty (CoD), and The Sims games with large, active communities and extensive modding ecosystems. GTA V, despite being over a decade old, remains a prime target, with nearly 4.5 million attack attempts leveraging fake mods, cracks, and early access offers. The upcoming release of GTA 6 in 2026 is expected to fuel further scams, as cybercriminals exploit pre-release hype with fake installers and beta invites. Minecraft followed closely with 4.1 million attack attempts, while CoD and The Sims saw 2.6 million and 2.4 million incidents, respectively. Threat actors typically lure victims through forums, social media groups, and messaging platforms, advertising fake cracks, loaders, mods, and exclusive in-game items. These malicious files often deploy infostealers, cryptocurrency hijackers, backdoors, and Trojans. The campaign highlights the risks of downloading pirated content or falling for too-good-to-be-true offers, as cybercriminals continue to exploit gaming culture for financial gain.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Malware Distribution
MOTIVATION
Financial gainData theft
IMPACT
Personally identifiable informationLogin credentialsGaming devicesPersonal computersIdentity Theft Risk: High
DATA BREACH
Login credentialsPersonally identifiable informationSensitivity Of Data: HighPersonally Identifiable Information: Yes
JULY 2024
648Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Jul 2024Kaspersky
Kaspersky Labs

Kaspersky Labs Sales Ban by US Commerce Department

630After Incident
CRITICAL-18
KAS000070824
Kaspersky Labs, a Moscow-based antivirus software company, faces a sales ban on its products by the US Commerce Department due to concerns over potential exploitation by the Russian government to harm US national security. The ban follows President Biden's sign of a law that may lead to a similar fate for TikTok if its Chinese parent company doesn't divest from it. This unprecedented move against cybersecurity products emphasizes geopolitical tensions over principles of open internet access and may not align strictly with evidence of the company's threats. Kaspersky denies US security threats, citing their longstanding record of contributing to the protection of US interests.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Government Ban
MOTIVATION
National Security Concerns
IMPACT
Negative Impact due to Government Ban
JUNE 2024
664Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Jun 2024Kaspersky
Kaspersky

US Government Bans Kaspersky Software

646After Incident
CRITICAL-18
KAS1019070724
The US government has banned Kaspersky from selling products to new US-based customers and limits services to existing customers amidst national security concerns. Allegations suggest that the Russian government could use Kaspersky's antivirus software to conduct espionage. This ban could disrupt American companies, including critical infrastructure sectors like telecommunications, power, and health care, which use Kaspersky software for cybersecurity protection.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Espionage
MOTIVATION
Espionage
IMPACT
Operational Impact: Potential disruption to American companies in critical infrastructure sectors
NOVEMBER 2021
755Before Incident
Ransomware
01 Nov 2021Kaspersky
Unnamed Victim, BlackCat and Unnamed Victim: Two US Security Experts Sentenced to Prison for Helping Ransomware Gang

Cybersecurity Professionals Sentenced for Ransomware Scheme

568After Incident
CRITICAL-187
KASBLA1777645750
Cybersecurity Professionals Sentenced for Ransomware Scheme Three U.S.-based cybersecurity experts have been sentenced or are awaiting sentencing for their roles in a ransomware extortion scheme. Ryan Goldberg (Georgia) and Kevin Martin (Texas) each received four-year prison terms after pleading guilty to conspiracy to obstruct interstate commerce by extortion. A third accomplice, Angelo Martino (Florida), recently pleaded guilty and is scheduled for sentencing on July 9. The trio, who worked at cybersecurity firms including as ransomware negotiators shifted to criminal activity, deploying BlackCat (ALPHV) ransomware to target multiple organizations. They paid 20% of ransom payments to the ransomware group’s administrators while laundering their 80% cut, including $1.2 million from a single victim. BlackCat ransomware, active from November 2021 to December 2023, compromised over 1,000 organizations before authorities disrupted the operation. Despite the takedown, the group later extorted $22 million from a victim and executed an exit scam. The U.S. government had offered a $10 million reward for information on key members, though no charges have been announced.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware
MOTIVATION
Financial gain
IMPACT
Financial Loss: $23.2 million (including $1.2 million from a single victim and $22 million from another)
DATA BREACH
Data Encryption: Yes (BlackCat ransomware encrypted data)
JUNE 2017
761Before Incident
Breach
16 Jun 2017Kaspersky
Kaspersky Labs

Ban on Kaspersky Labs Antivirus Software Sales

704After Incident
CRITICAL-57
KAS448070624
The United States Commerce Department is set to ban new sales of antivirus software from Moscow-based Kaspersky Labs due to national security concerns. This follows a 2017 federal ban on the use of Kaspersky software and concerns about the Russian government potentially weaponizing the software. While Kaspersky claims its products are secure and not a threat to US security, the geopolitical climate and strategic risks posed have prompted this prohibition. This decisive action signifies heightened cybersecurity measures amidst deteriorating US-Russia relations and increasing control of the Russian tech sector by the Kremlin.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Regulatory Ban
MOTIVATION
National Security Concerns
NOVEMBER 2015
764Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Nov 2015Kaspersky
Kaspersky

Kaspersky Targeted by Duqu Hacker Group

746After Incident
CRITICAL-18
KAS101522
Kaspersky, an organization that exposes and thwarts plenty of nation-state attacks was targeted by the Duqu hacker group. The attack was mainly aimed to access and steal the gathered intelligence on nation-state attacks from its servers and to know how Kaspersky’s detection algorithms and software work. The attack was implanted in six modules and an algorithm that was shared along with plenty of similar coding to hide the malware in plain sight.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
MOTIVATION
EspionageIntelligence Gathering
IMPACT
Intelligence on nation-state attacksDetection algorithms and software
DATA BREACH
Intelligence on nation-state attacksDetection algorithms and softwareSensitivity Of Data: High
JUNE 2015
777Before Incident
Cyber Attack
16 Jun 2015Kaspersky
SentinelOne, Kaspersky and Adlice Software: Hackers Weaponized 2,500+ Security Tools to Terminate Endpoint Protection Before Deploying Ransomware

Cybercriminals Weaponize Legitimate Windows Driver to Disable Security Tools in Large-Scale Attacks

762After Incident
CRITICAL-15
SENKASADL1769023372
Cybercriminals Weaponize Legitimate Windows Driver to Disable Security Tools in Large-Scale Attacks A sophisticated cyberattack campaign is exploiting a trusted Windows kernel driver truesight.sys, part of Adlice Software’s RogueKiller antivirus to disable endpoint detection and response (EDR) and antivirus solutions before deploying ransomware or remote access malware. The attack leverages over 2,500 validly signed variants of the vulnerable driver, bypassing Microsoft’s security controls by abusing legacy driver signing rules. Originally exposed by Check Point researchers, the technique allows threat actors to load pre-2015 signed drivers on modern Windows 11 systems, granting them kernel-level privileges to terminate security processes undetected. MagicSword analysts later confirmed the method’s rapid adoption by multiple threat groups, including financially motivated actors and advanced persistent threat (APT) groups. The driver’s IOCTL command enables attackers to forcibly kill nearly 200 security products, from CrowdStrike and SentinelOne to Kaspersky and Symantec, leaving systems exposed to ransomware like HiddenGh0st or other payloads. The infection chain typically begins with phishing emails, fake download sites, or compromised Telegram channels, tricking users into running a disguised installer. The malware then establishes persistence via scheduled tasks and DLL side-loading, deploys an obfuscated EDR killer module, and installs the TrueSight driver as a Windows service (often named TCLService). With security tools neutralized at the kernel level, the final payload executes with minimal resistance sometimes within 30 minutes of initial compromise. The attack’s high evasion rate and reliance on signature-based defenses make it particularly dangerous for enterprises, as victims often only detect the breach after encryption or data exfiltration has occurred. The campaign’s scale and effectiveness highlight the growing threat of legitimate driver abuse in modern cyberattacks.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
ransomwaremalware
MOTIVATION
financial gaindata exfiltration
IMPACT
Systems Affected: Windows systems (including Windows 11)Operational Impact: Disabling of EDR and antivirus solutions, leaving systems exposed to ransomware or malware
DATA BREACH
Data Exfiltration: Possible data exfiltrationData Encryption: Ransomware encryption (e.g., HiddenGh0st)

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Kaspersky ?
?
What was Kaspersky's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Kaspersky's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Kaspersky's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Kaspersky's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Kaspersky's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Kaspersky's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Kaspersky's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Kaspersky's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Kaspersky's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Kaspersky's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Kaspersky's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Kaspersky's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Kaspersky ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Kaspersky's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?