Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KasperskyKaspersky
VS
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONSNETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS
Kaspersky

Kaspersky

Bahnhofstrasse 69, Stadtkreis 1 Altstadt, 8001, CH

Last Update: 29/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://kaspersky.com/
463/1000Critical

Our mission is simple – building a safer world. And in fulfilling that mission we aim to become the global leader in cybersecurity – by securing technology to make sure that the possibilities it brings become opportunities for each and every one of us. Bring on endless ...

NAICS:541514
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:4,603
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
9
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

Suwalska 19/1, Poznan, 60-461, PL

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.n-security.com
767/1000Fair

## Our core business We manage linux / unix server infrastructures and build the efficient and secure networking environments using hardware cutting edge technologies suited to the needs of the project and the client. We believe in quality, opposed to quantity. O...

NAICS:541514
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,471
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kaspersky

Kaspersky

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)

Kaspersky has 782.35% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kaspersky (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kaspersky cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kaspersky

Kaspersky

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DRAMICCALKASRAZ1790677522
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ADO1788668623
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
KAS1788193712
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Kaspersky company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kaspersky company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kaspersky company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kaspersky company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kaspersky company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kaspersky company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kaspersky company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kaspersky company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kaspersky company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kaspersky company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kaspersky company and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kaspersky and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kaspersky and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kaspersky or NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kaspersky or NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS ?
Between Kaspersky and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kaspersky and NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9