Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Karolinska InstitutetKarolinska Institutet
VS
Ghent UniversityGhent University
Karolinska Institutet

Karolinska Institutet

Nobels väg 6, Solna, Solna, SE

Last Update: 05/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://ki.se
722/1000Moderate

Karolinska Institutet is one of the world´s leading medical universities. Our mission is to contribute to the improvement of human health through research and education. Karolinska Institutet accounts for over 40 per cent of the medical academic research conducted in...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:9,826
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Ghent University

Ghent University

Universiteitsforum (Ufo) Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 33, Gent, Gent, east flanders, BE, 9000

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ugent.be
796/1000Fair

Ghent University is a top 100 university and one of the major universities in Belgium, founded in 1817. Our 11 faculties offer a wide range of courses and conduct in-depth research within a wide range of scientific domains. We are a pluralistic university that is open t...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:11,252
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Karolinska Institutet

Karolinska Institutet

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ghent University

Ghent University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Karolinska Institutet has 40.83% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ghent University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Karolinska Institutet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Karolinska Institutet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ghent University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ghent University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Karolinska Institutet

Karolinska Institutet

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KAR1777991808
Ghent University

Ghent University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Karolinska Institutet company and Ghent University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Karolinska Institutet company and Ghent University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Karolinska Institutet company and Ghent University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Karolinska Institutet company and Ghent University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Karolinska Institutet company and Ghent University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Karolinska Institutet company and Ghent University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Karolinska Institutet company and Ghent University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Karolinska Institutet company and Ghent University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Karolinska Institutet company and Ghent University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Karolinska Institutet company and Ghent University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Karolinska Institutet company and Ghent University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Karolinska Institutet and Ghent University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Karolinska Institutet and Ghent University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Karolinska Institutet or Ghent University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Karolinska Institutet or Ghent University ?
Between Karolinska Institutet and Ghent University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Karolinska Institutet and Ghent University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2