Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kaplan International PathwaysKaplan International Pathways
VS
Florida International UniversityFlorida International University
Kaplan International Pathways

Kaplan International Pathways

4 Borough High Street, London, undefined, SE1 9QQ, GB

Last Update: 12/04/2026

View Profile
774/1000Fair

At Kaplan International Pathways, we help international students earn degrees from prestigious universities based in the UK, North America Australia and New Zealand, and to succeed in their education. Our vision is to connect students, agents, sponsors and partner univ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:708
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Florida International University

Florida International University

11200 S. W. 8 Street, Miami, FL, US, 33199

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fiu.edu
750/1000Fair

FIU is Miami's public research university. Offering bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees, both on campus and fully online. Designated a Preeminent State Research University, FIU emphasizes research as a major component in the university's mission. For more than...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:12,548
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kaplan International Pathways

Kaplan International Pathways

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Florida International University

Florida International University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kaplan International Pathways in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida International University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kaplan International Pathways (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kaplan International Pathways cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Florida International University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida International University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kaplan International Pathways

Kaplan International Pathways

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Florida International University

Florida International University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FLO203614522

FAQ

Between Kaplan International Pathways company and Florida International University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kaplan International Pathways company and Florida International University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kaplan International Pathways company and Florida International University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kaplan International Pathways company and Florida International University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kaplan International Pathways company and Florida International University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kaplan International Pathways company and Florida International University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kaplan International Pathways company and Florida International University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kaplan International Pathways company and Florida International University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kaplan International Pathways company and Florida International University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kaplan International Pathways company and Florida International University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kaplan International Pathways company and Florida International University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kaplan International Pathways and Florida International University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kaplan International Pathways and Florida International University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kaplan International Pathways or Florida International University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kaplan International Pathways or Florida International University ?
Between Kaplan International Pathways and Florida International University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kaplan International Pathways and Florida International University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9