Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş.Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş.
VS
Toys"R"UsToys"R"Us
Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş.

Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş.

Büyükdere Caddesi, Esentepe, 34394, TR

Last Update: 25/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kanyonyonetim.com
768/1000Fair

KANYON YÖNETİM İŞLETİM VE PAZARLAMA A.Ş. Kanyon Alışveriş Merkezi’ni yönetmek üzere kurulmuş olan Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş., bu konudaki başarısının ardından ortakların diğer gayrimenkul projelerini de yönetmeye başlamıştır. Bunların arasında Eczacıbaşı’...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:73
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Toys"R"Us

Toys"R"Us

Parsippany, 07054, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.toysrus.com
791/1000Fair

Toys“R”Us is a beloved brand known all around the world—and we know how to have fun! For over 70 years we've been the toy authority and ambassadors of all things play. Our new vision looks beyond traditional retail for a re-imagined, immersive experience for kids of all...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:13,652
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş.

Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Toys"R"Us

Toys"R"Us

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Toys"R"Us in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Toys"R"Us (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toys"R"Us cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş.

Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Toys"R"Us

Toys"R"Us

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Toys"R"Us company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Toys"R"Us company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Toys"R"Us company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Toys"R"Us company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Toys"R"Us company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Toys"R"Us company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Toys"R"Us company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Toys"R"Us company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Toys"R"Us company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Toys"R"Us company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Toys"R"Us company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. and Toys"R"Us, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. and Toys"R"Us, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. or Toys"R"Us ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. or Toys"R"Us ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. and Toys"R"Us, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. and Toys"R"Us, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94426
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.5.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /jobgroup/insert. This manipulation of the argument Name causes cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94425
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Moore Threads MTT S80 Driver Package 340.150. The affected element is the function sub_140006F0C in the library mtdispkm64.sys of the component IOCTL Handler. The manipulation results in improper privilege management. Attacking locally is a requirement. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2
CVE-2026-94627
SUMMARY

vLLM Mooncake connector through 0.29.0 fails to properly manage GPU KV cache block ownership when concurrent child requests share a single transfer ID in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Attackers can trigger GPU memory exhaustion by submitting completion requests with multiple prompts, causing orphaned KV cache blocks to accumulate until process restart and eventually preventing legitimate requests from executing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94626
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to validate the tp_size parameter in kv_transfer_params on OpenAI-compatible completion endpoints, allowing attackers to allocate unbounded memory. Attackers can supply arbitrary tp_size values in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments to exhaust memory and trigger kernel OOM-kill of the decode worker process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94625
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in MooncakeConnector where rejected prefill requests create ownerless transfer placeholders that are never reclaimed. Attackers can send rejected requests to exhaust sender task pools, causing valid requests to be delayed by up to 480 seconds while health checks continue returning success.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9