Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş.Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş.
VS
NikeNike
Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş.

Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş.

Büyükdere Caddesi, Esentepe, 34394, TR

Last Update: 25/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kanyonyonetim.com
768/1000Fair

KANYON YÖNETİM İŞLETİM VE PAZARLAMA A.Ş. Kanyon Alışveriş Merkezi’ni yönetmek üzere kurulmuş olan Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş., bu konudaki başarısının ardından ortakların diğer gayrimenkul projelerini de yönetmeye başlamıştır. Bunların arasında Eczacıbaşı’...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:73
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Nike

Nike

One Bowerman Drive, Beaverton, OR, US, 97005

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://nike.com/careers
305/1000Critical

NIKE, Inc. is a purpose-driven organization energized by a shared commitment to move the world forward through the power of sport. We champion diversity and amplify individual passions to bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete* in the world. Here, every te...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:95,347
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş.

Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nike

Nike

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Nike has 288.35% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nike (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nike cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş.

Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Nike

Nike

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NIKALC1783600235
🔒 Incident : Breach
JONGENMCDGOL1775507547
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NIK1769167310

FAQ

Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Nike company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Nike company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Nike company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Nike company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Nike company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Nike company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Nike company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Nike company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Nike company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Nike company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. company and Nike company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. and Nike, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. and Nike, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. or Nike ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. or Nike ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. and Nike, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kanyon Yönetim İşletim ve Pazarlama A.Ş. and Nike, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-91201
SUMMARY

DocsGPT through 0.20.0 posts OAuth connector session tokens to a wildcard target origin in the callback-status endpoint without validating sender origin. Attackers can obtain session tokens and provider account emails by acting as window.opener during OAuth authorization, then use tokens to disconnect victims' cloud storage connectors.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-14
UPDATED
Date2026-09-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-91200
SUMMARY

DevSpace through 6.3.21 fails to reject parent-directory segments in tar entry names from the in-pod sync stream. Attackers operating a malicious container can stream tar entries with traversal sequences to write arbitrary files on the developer workstation, enabling code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-14
UPDATED
Date2026-09-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-91199
SUMMARY

Refly through 1.1.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /v1/misc/scrape endpoint that fetches caller-supplied URLs without validating the scheme, host, or resolved address. Authenticated attackers can make the backend issue requests to loopback, private, and link-local addresses including cloud metadata services to read page titles and descriptions of internal resources.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-14
UPDATED
Date2026-09-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-91198
SUMMARY

GrowthBook through 5.0.1 returns unredacted fact table definitions including raw warehouse SQL in payloads served by unauthenticated public report and experiment endpoints. Attackers with knowledge of a publicly shared report or experiment identifier can read internal data warehouse query text, schema, table names, filter values and datasource identifiers.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-14
UPDATED
Date2026-09-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-91197
SUMMARY

Flowable flowable-engine through 8.0.0 contains an XML external entity injection vulnerability in ProcessDiagramLayoutFactory.parseXml() that fails to disable external entity resolution when parsing deployed BPMN resources. Attackers with process deployment privileges can embed DOCTYPE declarations with external entities in BPMN files to read arbitrary local files or trigger requests to internal network endpoints when diagram layout is computed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-14
UPDATED
Date2026-09-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8