Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTDKAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD
VS
HolcimHolcim
KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD

KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD

19 Changi Business Park Crescent, Singapore, 489690, SG

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
www.kajima-overseas-asia.com
752/1000Fair

Kajima Overseas Asia Pte Ltd is the Regional Hub for Kajima’s building construction business across South and Southeast Asia. We offer integrated engineering, design, and construction as a total solution provider. Backed by 185 years of success in Japan and a diver...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:163
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Holcim

Holcim

Grafenauweg 10, Zug, CH, 6300

Last Update: 19/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.holcim.com/
804/1000Good

Holcim is the leading partner for sustainable construction with net sales of CHF 15.7 billion in 2025, creating value across the built environment from infrastructure and industry to buildings. We have more than 45 000 employees in 43 attractive markets – across Europ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:41,823
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD

KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Holcim

Holcim

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holcim in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Holcim (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holcim cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD

KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Holcim

Holcim

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD company and Holcim company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD company and Holcim company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD company and Holcim company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD company and Holcim company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD company and Holcim company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD company and Holcim company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD company and Holcim company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD company and Holcim company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD company and Holcim company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD company and Holcim company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD company and Holcim company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD and Holcim, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD and Holcim, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD or Holcim ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD or Holcim ?
Between KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD and Holcim, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KAJIMA OVERSEAS ASIA PTE LTD and Holcim, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2