Comparison Overview
Kaiser Permanente

Kaiser Permanente
1 Kaiser Plaza, Oakland, 94612, US
Last Update: 12/09/2026
At the heart of health care, you’ll find Kaiser Permanente. As the nation’s leading not-for-profit, integrated health plan, we make a difference in the lives of members, patients, and communities across the country. With 39 hospitals and more than 734 locations in eig...

Dignity Health
185 Berry St, San Francisco, 94158, US
Last Update: 12/06/2026
We provide quality, compassionate health care at more than 40 hospitals and care centers that are serving communities across California, Arizona and Nevada every minute of every day. And while not everyone may live near a major medical facility, Dignity Health is making...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Kaiser Permanente







Dignity Health






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
Kaiser Permanente has 29.08% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
Dignity Health has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Kaiser Permanente (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Kaiser Permanente cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Dignity Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Dignity Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Kaiser Permanente

Dignity Health
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.